Skip to main content

Shakopee Friendship Manor: GI Bleed Policy Gap - MN

Healthcare Facility
Shakopee Friendship Manor
Shakopee, MN  ·  3/5 stars

Shakopee Friendship Manor, a nursing facility in this Scott County city southwest of Minneapolis, was inspected in September 2025 following a complaint. What inspectors found wasn't a chaotic scene or a staff member who had ignored an obvious emergency. It was quieter than that, and in some ways more troubling: a written policy that told nurses exactly which symptoms required urgent action, and left one serious warning sign completely off the list.

The facility had a Change of Condition policy, revised as recently as March 2025. It walked staff through the steps to take when a resident's health shifted: observe, take vital signs, gather relevant information, then notify the physician if needed and document everything in the medical record. The policy even sorted situations into two categories, those requiring immediate physician notification and those that could wait up to eight hours.

The eight-hour list was specific. Abdominal pain with vomiting. Seizure activity. Medication errors that weren't life-threatening. Increased behavioral changes. Respiratory changes like a new cough or congestion. The policy named each of these by example, giving nurses a concrete reference point.

A potential gastrointestinal bleed was not on it. Not under the eight-hour category. Not under the immediate-notification category. Not anywhere.

The signs of a GI bleed, black or tarry stools, an unusual odor with stool, are among the more recognizable indicators that something has gone seriously wrong inside a patient's digestive tract. An upper GI bleed, originating in the stomach or small intestine, can turn stool dark because blood is digested during its passage through the gut. A lower GI bleed may present differently. Either way, the symptom is one that clinicians are trained to treat as urgent.

Shakopee Friendship Manor's March 2025 policy said nothing about it.

Inspectors noted the facility had begun working on a care plan update for the resident, identified in the report only as R1, but had not finished it because R1 was still hospitalized at the time of the inspection. The report does not describe what brought R1 to the hospital, how long they had been there, or what their condition was. It does not say whether anyone failed to recognize a symptom or failed to call a doctor. The citation is focused on the policy itself, on what the written guidance did and did not tell staff to watch for.

That distinction matters. A policy gap is not the same as a proven failure of care. Inspectors rated the harm level as minimal, or potential for actual harm, and noted that few residents were affected. The citation, under F0684, addresses the standard requiring facilities to ensure each resident receives care in accordance with professional standards of practice.

But a policy revised five months before the inspection still didn't tell nurses that black stools warranted a call to the physician. That's what the March 2025 document said. Coughs, yes. Seizures, yes. Vomiting with abdominal pain, yes. A potential GI bleed, no.

Nursing home policies aren't just paperwork. They are the written standard against which a night-shift aide or a newer nurse measures her own judgment at two in the morning when a resident's condition changes and the supervisor isn't immediately available. A policy that lists some symptoms and omits others doesn't just fail to help in those omitted situations. It can actively mislead, suggesting that what isn't listed isn't urgent.

The facility's own policy framed it that way, by example. Here are the things that require immediate action. Here are the things that can wait eight hours. The message embedded in that structure is that anything not mentioned falls somewhere in a gray zone, or perhaps doesn't rise to the level of concern at all.

R1 was in the hospital. The care plan update was pending. The policy, as of the inspection date, still had the gap.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Shakopee Friendship Manor from 2025-09-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

Editorial Standards & Data Disclosure

Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.

Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.

Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.

Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: September 14, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

SHAKOPEE FRIENDSHIP MANOR in SHAKOPEE, MN was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 22, 2025.

Shakopee Friendship Manor, a nursing facility in this Scott County city southwest of Minneapolis, was inspected in September 2025 following a complaint.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at SHAKOPEE FRIENDSHIP MANOR?
Shakopee Friendship Manor, a nursing facility in this Scott County city southwest of Minneapolis, was inspected in September 2025 following a complaint.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SHAKOPEE, MN, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from SHAKOPEE FRIENDSHIP MANOR or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 245445.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check SHAKOPEE FRIENDSHIP MANOR's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.