Resident 93's blood pressure swung wildly during the monitoring period, ranging from a dangerous low of 103/61 to a critically high 200/108. On two separate days, staff documented no blood pressure readings at all despite the doctor's explicit order for checks every four hours due to his heart condition.
Temperature monitoring proved equally inconsistent. Electronic records showed the resident's temperature was checked just eight times over a multi-day period, with readings varying from a concerning low of 96 degrees to 98.7 degrees. The inspection found no documented evidence that his temperature was assessed as ordered.
Federal inspectors discovered the monitoring failures during a September complaint investigation at King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation. The facility's electronic monitoring system revealed the extent of the missed vital signs checks through detailed timestamp records.
Blood pressure readings, when they were taken, showed dramatic fluctuations that should have triggered immediate medical attention. The resident's systolic pressure varied by nearly 100 points, swinging from 103 to 200 over the course of the monitoring period. Such extreme variations in a heart failure patient can signal life-threatening complications.
The Director of Nursing confirmed the violations during an interview with inspectors. She verified that nursing staff were "just initialing on the TAR" - the treatment administration record - without actually performing the vital signs checks as ordered.
She acknowledged there was no documented evidence that vital signs including blood pressure, pulse, respirations and temperature were assessed as ordered for the heart failure patient. The nursing director also revealed the facility had no written policy regarding how to obtain and document vital signs.
The doctor's order was clear and medically necessary: vital signs every four hours for congestive heart failure. CHF patients require frequent monitoring because their condition can deteriorate rapidly, and changes in blood pressure, heart rate and temperature can signal dangerous complications requiring immediate intervention.
Electronic records showed blood pressure was documented at erratic intervals throughout each day. Some days included readings at 3:34 A.M., then not again until 10:12 A.M., followed by an 11:06 P.M. check. Other days showed clusters of readings followed by gaps of many hours.
The inconsistent monitoring meant medical staff had no reliable picture of how the resident's heart condition was progressing. Temperature checks were even more sporadic, with some readings showing potentially dangerous drops below normal body temperature.
When staff did document vital signs, the readings revealed a patient whose cardiovascular system was unstable. Blood pressure readings of 200/108 indicate severe hypertension that could trigger stroke or heart attack in a patient already compromised by congestive heart failure.
Conversely, readings of 103/61 suggest hypotension that could indicate the heart is failing to pump blood effectively throughout the body. Both extremes require immediate medical assessment and potential intervention.
The facility's lack of a written policy for vital signs monitoring compounded the problem. Without clear procedures, nursing staff had no standard protocol for ensuring doctor's orders were followed or for recognizing when readings required immediate medical attention.
The Director of Nursing's admission that staff were falsifying records by initialing for work they hadn't performed represents a fundamental breakdown in patient safety protocols. Treatment administration records are legal documents that other medical professionals rely on to make critical care decisions.
For Resident 93, the monitoring failures meant his congestive heart failure went inadequately supervised during a period when his vital signs showed he needed intensive medical oversight. The dramatic swings in his blood pressure readings suggest his condition was unstable and required the frequent monitoring his doctor had ordered.
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint filed with state health officials. Federal regulators classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents.
King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation operates a 120-bed facility on Cedar Road in this Cleveland suburb. The monitoring failures occurred despite the facility's electronic tracking systems that should have made it easier for supervisors to ensure doctor's orders were being followed.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC from 2025-09-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC
- Browse all OH nursing home inspections