Skip to main content
Advertisement

King David Post Acute: 12 Days Without Bathing - OH

Resident #8 at King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation went from August 18 to September 1 without a bath or shower, according to federal inspection records. The same resident had previously gone 10 consecutive days without bathing from July 17 to July 28.

King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC facility inspection

The resident's daughter told inspectors she repeatedly asked staff to ensure her father received showers. She would pass along the request to aides coming on shift, but often returned the next day to find he still had not been bathed.

Advertisement

When inspectors examined the shower documentation sheets, they discovered a more troubling pattern. Staff had signed off on providing showers on September 1, September 4, September 8, and September 11, but the signatures were completely illegible.

The Director of Nursing confirmed during a September 15 interview that she could not identify which staff members had signed the shower sheets for those four dates. She told inspectors the facility had contacted all staff who worked those shifts, but none could determine who had actually provided the baths.

The next day, both the Administrator and Director of Nursing repeated the same admission. They remained unable to identify the staff members who claimed to have bathed Resident #8 on those four dates, despite contacting everyone who worked those shifts.

The facility's own policy, dated September 9, 2022, requires residents to be bathed or showered at least twice weekly to maintain hygiene and skin condition. When staff complete bathing, they must document it on shower sheets and electronic records.

The policy also outlines what should happen when residents refuse baths. Nursing assistants must report refusals to the charge nurse, who should speak with the resident about alternatives and document the refusal in medical records.

No such refusal documentation exists for Resident #8's extended periods without bathing.

The illegible signatures raise questions about whether the resident actually received baths on the four dates in question. If the signatures are authentic but unreadable, it suggests poor record-keeping practices. If staff members cannot remember providing the care they supposedly documented, it indicates either falsified records or a systematic failure to track basic hygiene care.

The inspection was conducted in response to multiple complaints filed against the facility. The bathing violations were investigated under five separate complaint numbers spanning several months.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to assist residents with personal hygiene and bathing as needed. The failure to provide adequate bathing can lead to skin breakdown, infections, and dignity violations for residents who cannot care for themselves.

The case highlights broader concerns about documentation integrity in nursing homes. When staff cannot identify their own signatures on care records, it becomes impossible to ensure accountability or verify that residents actually received the documented care.

For Resident #8's family, the situation meant watching their loved one go nearly two weeks without basic hygiene care despite paying for professional nursing services. The daughter's repeated requests to staff went unheeded, leaving her to discover each day that promises of bathing had not been fulfilled.

The facility's inability to identify which staff members signed the shower sheets months after the fact suggests either inadequate training on documentation requirements or a culture where staff routinely sign records without providing the documented care.

King David Post Acute's violation was classified as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm to few residents. However, the extended periods without bathing and the mystery surrounding illegible signatures point to systemic problems with both care delivery and record-keeping that could affect other residents as well.

The inspection findings represent just one complaint investigation among several conducted at the facility, indicating ongoing concerns about care quality and documentation practices at King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC from 2025-09-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 8, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

KING DAVID POST ACUTE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC in BEACHWOOD, OH was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 22, 2025.

The same resident had previously gone 10 consecutive days without bathing from July 17 to July 28.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at KING DAVID POST ACUTE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC?
The same resident had previously gone 10 consecutive days without bathing from July 17 to July 28.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in BEACHWOOD, OH, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from KING DAVID POST ACUTE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 365094.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check KING DAVID POST ACUTE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.