Skip to main content
Advertisement

Alamo Nursing Home: 4-Inch Bleeding Wound - MI

Healthcare Facility:

Resident 108 lay in bed at Alamo Nursing Home with an actively bleeding wound on her right buttock when CNA Y performed what inspectors called improper care. The assistant rolled up the wet pad underneath the resident and pulled it out from under her body, despite facility knowledge that this pulling motion causes shearing — where surface skin separates from underlying tissue.

Alamo Nursing Home Inc facility inspection

The wound stretched approximately four inches long as a bright red linear opening with dead tissue around it. CNA Y reported the red wound was new, appearing since the previous day.

Advertisement

Unit Manager X, who assessed the wound alongside a wound care provider the day before, said it looked "much worse" when she observed it again on September 17. She pointed out that while staff knew about a small superficial round wound on the lower right buttock, the area of dead tissue and the bright red linear wound were entirely new.

"Staff should not pull the linens, pads or briefs out from under the resident due to potential for shearing," Unit Manager X told inspectors, acknowledging the exact technique she had just witnessed CNA Y perform.

The resident required enhanced barrier precautions due to her wounds and catheter, but no sign was posted at her door to alert staff. Neither CNA Y nor LPN OO wore gowns before providing direct care, violating infection control protocols.

CNA Y applied barrier cream directly over the wounds from a tube sitting on the resident's nightstand. She reported that the day before, the barrier cream had gone missing, though nursing assistants normally applied it during incontinence care.

The resident remained continent of bowel and bladder and did not use incontinence briefs, according to CNA Y.

LPN OO, who frequently worked the resident's hallway, reported she had never observed the buttock wound. LPN BB said she also had not seen the wound, explaining that her hall was "very busy and difficult to get through medication pass."

CNA DD, who worked with Resident 108 during the previous night shift, described the wound as "red, elongated and had yellow open areas." She said the resident experienced pain from the wound and reported using spray wound cleanser and applying barrier cream once during the night.

Director of Nursing B confirmed that Resident 108 was cognitively intact and capable of verbalizing events related to her care. She emphasized that nursing staff should administer all wound care treatment orders to ensure nurses routinely observed wounds.

After inspectors documented the worsening condition, Unit Manager X spoke with the medical provider and changed the wound care orders. The facility switched to Medi Honey, a topical medication that promotes moist wound healing and removes dead tissue, covered with a bandage.

The new physician orders, dated September 18, classified the injury as a "right gluteal unstageable wound" — a pressure injury where depth cannot be determined due to dead tissue covering the area. The orders specified cleansing with wound cleanser, applying Medi Honey and collagen to maintain moisture, and covering with border gauze each morning.

Unit Manager X applied the new wound dressing after the order change.

The inspection revealed that nursing assistants routinely applied barrier cream to wounds during incontinence care without nursing supervision, despite the Director of Nursing's statement that all wound care should be administered by nursing staff for proper monitoring.

Federal inspectors found the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, resulting in actual harm to few residents.

The case highlighted gaps between facility policies and actual practice. While managers understood proper wound care techniques and the risks of shearing, front-line staff continued using methods known to worsen skin injuries.

Resident 108's wound progression from a small superficial injury to a 4-inch actively bleeding wound with dead tissue occurred under the care of staff who had access to appropriate supplies but lacked consistent oversight of wound care procedures.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Alamo Nursing Home Inc from 2025-09-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 8, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

Alamo Nursing Home Inc in Kalamazoo, MI was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 22, 2025.

Resident 108 lay in bed at Alamo Nursing Home with an actively bleeding wound on her right buttock when CNA Y performed what inspectors called improper care.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Alamo Nursing Home Inc?
Resident 108 lay in bed at Alamo Nursing Home with an actively bleeding wound on her right buttock when CNA Y performed what inspectors called improper care.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in Kalamazoo, MI, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Alamo Nursing Home Inc or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 235311.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Alamo Nursing Home Inc's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.