Resident 38 arrived at the facility on July 25 with multiple serious conditions. His medical record listed heart failure, pericardial effusion where excessive fluid accumulates around the heart, coronary artery disease with narrowed arteries supplying blood to the heart, acute-on-chronic kidney disease, and high blood pressure.

Three weeks later, his potassium levels spiked to dangerous levels.
On August 15, staff sent him to the hospital. His representative was present when the facility offered a bed hold policy, which would have reserved his spot while he received hospital treatment. The representative declined.
The resident was discharged from the facility entirely.
But no one completed the paperwork.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to document a recapitulation — a complete summary of every resident's stay from admission to discharge. The facility's own policy states that team leaders must complete discharge checklists and notify necessary departments, while nurses must complete discharge progress notes.
None of that happened for Resident 38.
State inspectors discovered the missing documentation during a September complaint investigation. Of five resident records they reviewed, Resident 38's file was the only one missing the required discharge summary.
The MDS coordinator, responsible for resident assessments, confirmed during a September 17 interview that no discharge summary had been completed. The coordinator told inspectors they didn't think a discharge summary was necessary because the resident was sent to the hospital.
The coordinator acknowledged knowing that the resident's representative had declined the bed hold policy and that the resident had been discharged from the facility.
The facility houses 32 residents. Federal inspectors classified this as a violation causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm affecting few residents.
Potassium levels that become critically high can cause dangerous heart rhythm abnormalities and muscle weakness. For someone already dealing with heart failure, pericardial effusion, and kidney disease, such an electrolyte imbalance represents a serious medical emergency requiring immediate hospital intervention.
The missing discharge documentation means there's no official record summarizing how the resident's multiple conditions progressed during his stay, what treatments he received, or how his care team responded to the deteriorating kidney function that likely contributed to the potassium crisis.
Discharge summaries serve multiple purposes beyond regulatory compliance. They provide crucial continuity of care information for hospital staff treating the resident and create a permanent record of the nursing home's care decisions and outcomes.
Without this documentation, there's no official accounting of how a resident with complex cardiac and kidney conditions developed a life-threatening electrolyte imbalance serious enough to require emergency hospitalization.
The facility's policy clearly outlines the discharge process, yet staff apparently believed hospital transfers exempted them from completing required documentation. This interpretation contradicts federal requirements that apply regardless of discharge destination.
The MDS coordinator's confusion about when discharge summaries are required suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of documentation obligations. Whether residents go home, to another facility, or to the hospital, the same paperwork requirements apply.
For Resident 38's family, the missing summary means no comprehensive record exists of his deteriorating condition during those final weeks at Tabitha Nursing Center. The documentation gap leaves questions about whether warning signs of the potassium crisis were identified and addressed appropriately.
The violation occurred at a time when the facility was operating near capacity, with 32 residents requiring complex medical care and thorough documentation of their treatment outcomes.
State inspectors found the facility in violation of Nebraska Administrative Code requirements for resident documentation and notification. The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint, though the specific nature of that complaint was not detailed in the violation report.
Federal regulations exist to ensure families and future care providers have complete information about nursing home stays, particularly when residents experience medical emergencies requiring hospital transfer.
In this case, a resident's three-week struggle with multiple life-threatening conditions ended with a medical crisis serious enough to require emergency intervention, but the facility created no official record of how that crisis developed or what care decisions led to the hospitalization.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Tabitha Nursing Center At Crete from 2025-09-18 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Tabitha Nursing Center At Crete
- Browse all NE nursing home inspections