It was the second time in two weeks the facility had failed him.
Resident R2 needed specialized wound care for cellulitis and chronic venous ulcer on his right leg. The 83-year-old had been admitted to Roosevelt on August 28 with these conditions, discharged from a hospital that specifically ordered him to follow up with podiatry on September 2.
That appointment never happened.
During a September 17 interview with state inspectors, the resident described his frustration. Staff had told him prior to both appointments that transportation was arranged. Each time, when the appointment hour arrived, he learned there was no ride.
"Resident stated staff missed his appointment and did not arrange the transportation two weeks ago and on September 16, 2025," inspectors documented.
The resident's medical records revealed the scope of the facility's failure to coordinate his care. Hospital discharge papers from August 28 clearly indicated the September 2 podiatry follow-up. The facility's own clinical records contained no evidence he was seen by podiatry as ordered.
No documented reason existed for the cancellation.
When podiatry did eventually evaluate the resident on September 9, the provider scheduled another appointment for September 16 at 1:30 p.m. Again, Roosevelt's records showed no evidence the resident attended this appointment.
Again, no documented reason for the cancellation appeared in his file.
The Director of Nursing, Employee E2, confirmed the facility's responsibility when interviewed by inspectors on September 12. She acknowledged that Roosevelt had missed both of the resident's appointments but could not explain why.
The resident's conditions made these missed appointments particularly concerning. Cellulitis is a bacterial skin infection that can spread rapidly if untreated. Chronic venous hypertension ulcers are wounds caused by poor circulation that require specialized care to heal properly and prevent complications.
Both conditions affecting his right lower extremity demanded the kind of expertise only an outside podiatrist could provide.
Roosevelt Rehabilitation operates in a regulatory environment where facilities must either employ qualified professionals or arrange for outside services when residents need specialized care. The facility chose the latter option for this resident's podiatry needs but failed to execute the basic logistics.
The pattern revealed systemic breakdown in care coordination. Hospital discharge planners had done their job, clearly documenting the need for podiatry follow-up. The podiatrist who eventually saw the resident had done his job, scheduling appropriate follow-up care. Roosevelt's staff had even done part of their job, telling the resident his transportation was arranged.
But when appointment time came, twice, no transportation existed.
The resident's experience illustrates how administrative failures can directly impact medical outcomes. Infected wounds and circulation problems don't pause while facilities sort out transportation logistics. Each missed appointment represented lost time in addressing conditions that could worsen without proper care.
State inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm with potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. But for Resident R2, sitting ready for appointments that never materialized, the impact was immediate and personal.
The facility's inability to provide a reason for either missed appointment suggested the failures weren't isolated incidents but reflected broader problems with care coordination systems. When the Director of Nursing cannot explain why critical medical appointments were missed, it raises questions about oversight and accountability within the facility.
Roosevelt's violation occurred under Pennsylvania regulations requiring nursing facilities to ensure residents receive necessary services, whether provided in-house or through outside arrangements. The regulation exists specifically to prevent situations where residents fall through administrative cracks.
For Resident R2, those cracks meant sitting with infected wounds, waiting for care that had been promised but not delivered. His trust in staff assurances about arranged transportation had been broken twice in the span of two weeks.
The inspection report documented his words simply: staff told him the transportation was arranged, then told him there was no transportation when appointment time arrived.
Between those two conversations lay the difference between a functioning healthcare system and one that fails its most vulnerable residents at the moment they need it most.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from 2025-09-17 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
- Browse all PA nursing home inspections