Skip to main content
Advertisement

Broadview Center: Ankle Fracture Goes Unmonitored - WA

Healthcare Facility:

Resident 8 reported the incident when she returned from an outing, telling a nurse she had bumped her ankle. The nurse documented the complaint and referred her to a provider but never placed her on "alert charting" — the facility's system for tracking residents with changes in condition.

The Broadview Center facility inspection

For three consecutive days, nursing progress notes showed no documentation of monitoring for Resident 8's ankle pain or related symptoms.

Advertisement

Staff H, a nurse, acknowledged the oversight during a September 12 interview. "I don't see that," she said when asked about alert charting documentation. She agreed the resident should have been monitored for signs and symptoms related to her ankle pain complaint.

The facility's Director of Nursing, Staff B, confirmed their protocol during the same interview. "The facility placed residents on alert charting if there was a change of condition and that included anything outside of the ordinary," she said. Staff placed on alert charting were expected to have follow-up documentation.

But no such documentation existed for August 22, 23, or 24.

"Yes, I am aware of that situation, that was brought to my attention after the resident was in the hospital," Staff B said. She acknowledged the resident should have been monitored for changes and that the provider should have followed up promptly.

The oversight had serious consequences. A provider didn't order X-rays until August 25 — four days after the initial incident. When results showed a fracture, the resident was immediately transferred to the hospital.

The facility's internal investigation, completed August 29 by Staff B, revealed the scope of the failure. The Resident Care Manager learned about the hospitalization during a clinical meeting on August 27, discovering the transfer was "due to a fracture of her right foot."

According to the investigation summary, the RCM was "unaware of incident because the nurse did not place [Resident 8] on alert [charting]." The document stated: "The nurse who was informed when resident returned from outing (08/21/2025) regarding bumping her foot and that this nurse failed to place resident on alert or 24-hour report which would have alerted other nurses to follow up."

The investigation found no evidence of provider follow-up, despite the nursing referral.

During a September 15 follow-up interview, Staff B claimed the incident didn't affect the resident's mobility or routine. When asked how she gathered this information, she said she asked the RCM. But when pressed about documentation supporting this assessment, Staff B admitted: "No."

Medical records contradicted her claims. A provider's readmission note from September 1 documented a "blood clot likely due to immobilization following tibial fracture."

When confronted with this medical finding, Staff B said: "I [do not] have anything to say about it."

The facility's Administrator, Staff C, acknowledged the monitoring failure during a September 16 interview. She stated they expected Resident 8 would have been monitored for ongoing changes related to the August 21 incident and her ankle pain complaint.

The case illustrates how a single documentation failure can cascade into serious medical complications. The resident's initial ankle complaint — properly documented and referred — fell through the facility's monitoring system because staff didn't activate alert charting protocols.

Without ongoing assessment, the resident's condition deteriorated undetected for days. The tibial fracture, likely present from the original incident, went undiagnosed until August 25. By then, immobilization from the unrecognized injury had caused a blood clot requiring hospitalization.

The facility's internal investigation revealed systemic communication breakdowns. The RCM, responsible for resident care coordination, remained unaware of the incident for nearly a week. Other nursing staff, without alert charting notifications, had no indication to monitor the resident's condition.

Federal inspectors found the facility violated regulations requiring comprehensive assessments and care planning. The violation affected few residents but posed minimal harm or potential for actual harm, according to the inspection report.

The case demonstrates how documentation failures in nursing homes can have medical consequences extending far beyond paperwork. A resident's simple complaint of ankle pain, properly reported but inadequately tracked, resulted in an undetected fracture, blood clot formation, and emergency hospitalization that might have been prevented with appropriate monitoring protocols.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for The Broadview Center from 2025-09-16 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 11, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

THE BROADVIEW CENTER in SEATTLE, WA was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 16, 2025.

Resident 8 reported the incident when she returned from an outing, telling a nurse she had bumped her ankle.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at THE BROADVIEW CENTER?
Resident 8 reported the incident when she returned from an outing, telling a nurse she had bumped her ankle.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SEATTLE, WA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from THE BROADVIEW CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 505416.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check THE BROADVIEW CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.