Skip to main content
Advertisement

Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation: Assessment Failures - CA

The woman, identified as Resident 1, had been admitted in March 2022 with major depression, anemia, and fatigue. By July 2025, she remained independent with dressing, standing up, transferring between bed and chair, and walking 50 feet with two turns.

Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation Center facility inspection

But something changed.

Advertisement

Certified Nurse Assistant D told inspectors on September 3 that the resident "had experienced a functional decline recently" and required "much more assistance with transfers." The aide said the woman "has been having weakness and balance problems, uses her cane more and needs help getting out of bed."

By August 21, a care conference documented the resident's "gradual decline in physical ability." The notes showed she "previously was able to walk around facility, and now required a wheelchair."

The facility's own records showed Resident 1 had triggered for a change of condition assessment on August 12 due to weight loss. Federal regulations require nursing homes to complete new assessments within 14 days when residents experience significant changes.

Nobody did one.

The facility's policy, revised in October 2023, defined a significant change as "a decline that would not resolve on its own, required staff intervention, impacted more than one area of the resident's health status, and required IDT review and/or revision of the care plan."

Resident 1's situation checked every box. She had lost functional ability across multiple areas, needed staff intervention for transfers and mobility, and required equipment she hadn't needed before.

The MDS Nurse, responsible for completing these assessments, told inspectors the functional decline and weight loss "would require a change of condition MDS assessment to be done." But the nurse added a crucial caveat: "Unless it was communicated to me, I wouldn't know to do it."

No assessment was completed.

The MDS Nurse confirmed to inspectors that the evaluation "should have been completed within 14 days of Resident 1's significant change of condition." The nurse explained the stakes: "The purpose of the change of condition MDS was to trigger care plans and ensure we are providing appropriate care."

Resident 1 had been diagnosed with a major neurocognitive disorder due to possible Alzheimer's Disease, according to a December 2023 neuropsychological assessment. She was not her own decision maker.

During the August care conference, staff documented her transformation from an ambulatory resident to someone who required a wheelchair for mobility. They noted her previous ability to walk around the facility independently.

The Administrator confirmed to inspectors on September 5 that "there was no change of condition MDS assessment completed."

Federal inspectors found the failure had "potential for a delay in the review and revision of the care plan." The care plan contains documented resident goals and instructions for staff care.

The facility's interdisciplinary team includes healthcare professionals who coordinate care together. Their policy required them to determine when residents met significant change requirements and trigger appropriate assessments.

For Resident 1, that determination came too late. By the time inspectors arrived in September, she had been declining for weeks without the formal assessment that could have prompted care plan modifications.

The woman who once dressed herself independently and transferred without help now needed assistance getting out of bed. She had progressed from walking 50 feet with two turns to requiring a wheelchair for mobility around the facility.

Her weight loss had triggered an automatic flag in the facility's system on August 12. The functional decline was obvious to staff by August 21. But the assessment designed to ensure appropriate care never happened.

The MDS assessment serves as more than paperwork. It triggers care plan reviews, ensures proper interventions, and documents changes that affect how staff should approach a resident's daily needs.

Without it, Resident 1's care remained based on her July assessment showing independence with transfers and mobility. The reality of her August condition, requiring wheelchair assistance and help with basic movements, existed only in scattered notes and staff observations.

The disconnect between her documented abilities and actual needs persisted for weeks, with no formal mechanism to bridge the gap until inspectors discovered the oversight in September.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation Center from 2025-09-12 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 13, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

LASSEN NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER in SUSANVILLE, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 12, 2025.

The woman, identified as Resident 1, had been admitted in March 2022 with major depression, anemia, and fatigue.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at LASSEN NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER?
The woman, identified as Resident 1, had been admitted in March 2022 with major depression, anemia, and fatigue.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SUSANVILLE, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from LASSEN NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 056231.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check LASSEN NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.