Luna Wellness Rehabilitation LLC omitted a May 20 fall with injury from the admission assessment for the 24th resident, according to a September complaint investigation by state inspectors. The facility's own MDS coordinator acknowledged the error during questioning.

The resident arrived at Luna Wellness on May 16 with a complex medical profile. He had chronic peripheral insufficiency, a venous disease affecting his legs. Type 2 diabetes had caused skin complications. Osteoarthritis in his left knee limited mobility, and generalized muscle weakness made daily activities difficult.
His dementia came with agitation. He needed help with personal care.
Four days after admission, he fell. The facility's incident records show he fell again on May 30, then once more on July 22.
But only two of those falls appeared in his health assessment records.
The Minimum Data Set assessment serves as the foundation for care planning in nursing homes. Federal regulations require facilities to document all relevant health information, including falls and injuries, to ensure residents receive appropriate care.
Luna Wellness documented the resident's multiple diagnoses in detail. The assessment noted his peripheral insufficiency, explaining it occurs "when veins in your legs are damaged." It described his diabetes complications, noting they happen "when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood."
The facility recorded his osteoarthritis as "a degenerative joint condition that primarily affects one side of the body." It documented his muscle weakness and need for personal care assistance.
His dementia appeared in the assessment as "unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation," defined as "the loss of cognitive functioning and thinking."
What didn't appear was the May 20 fall.
By June 13, nearly a month after that undocumented fall, the resident's physician ordered bed rails. The doctor authorized "2 1/4 side rails" to help with "increased mobility and independence."
The same day, staff updated his care plan. The resident would use the bed rails "to assist in bed mobility and transfers to maximize independence," the plan stated.
The facility described these rails as "a type of bed rail that is typically used in medical settings to prevent patients from exiting their beds."
But the connection between the fall and the bed rails never made it into his formal assessment.
On August 27, inspectors interviewed the MDS coordinator. The coordinator confirmed what the records showed: the May 20 fall with injury should have been documented in the resident's admission assessment.
The coordinator also acknowledged that the bed rail use should have been included in the assessment.
Federal inspectors classified the violation as causing "minimal harm or potential for actual harm." They noted the deficient practice "could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the residents' needs."
The facility reviewed three residents' assessments during the inspection. Only one contained errors, but those errors involved a resident whose medical complexity demanded precise documentation.
His combination of dementia, diabetes, mobility issues, and fall history created multiple care challenges. The undocumented fall occurred just four days after admission, during a critical period when staff were still learning his needs and behaviors.
The bed rails ordered after his falls represented a significant intervention. Such devices can affect a resident's mobility, independence, and safety. Federal guidelines require facilities to document their use and justify their necessity.
For residents with dementia, falls often signal changes in cognitive or physical status. Each incident provides information about triggers, timing, and potential prevention strategies. Missing documentation can leave gaps in understanding patterns that might prevent future injuries.
The resident's agitation, noted in his dementia diagnosis, could have contributed to his falls. His muscle weakness and knee arthritis created additional fall risks. His diabetes might have affected his balance or vision.
All of these factors should have been considered together when planning his care after the May 20 fall.
The inspection occurred more than three months after the undocumented fall. By then, the resident had fallen twice more, suggesting ongoing safety concerns that might have been better addressed with complete initial documentation.
Luna Wellness Rehabilitation must submit a plan of correction to continue participating in Medicare and Medicaid programs. The facility has not yet provided its response to the citation.
The resident remains at the facility, still using bed rails to assist with mobility and transfers.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Luna Wellness Rehabilitation LLC from 2025-09-03 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Luna Wellness Rehabilitation LLC
- Browse all NM nursing home inspections