Skip to main content
Advertisement

South Pasadena Care Center: Privacy Violations - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The responsible party for Resident 1 at South Pasadena Care Center kept the tablet's camera running continuously, capturing footage of the entire room including two roommates who explicitly objected to being recorded. Federal inspectors found the surveillance violated the privacy rights of all three residents during a September 2025 complaint investigation.

South Pasadena Care Center facility inspection

Resident 2 argued directly with the responsible party about the camera installation. She told inspectors she felt uncomfortable using the restroom because of Resident 1's tablet camera. The Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 2 had stated she did not want to be recorded and was okay with cameras outside her room but not inside.

Advertisement

The camera's impact extended beyond privacy violations.

Resident 3, who has Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and dementia with severely impaired cognitive skills, told inspectors the responsible party "was not good" and "talked a lot." She said she couldn't sleep because the light was turned on 24 hours and there was too much talking between the responsible party and Resident 1. The constant lighting gave her headaches from exhaustion.

"She just kept quiet" about the situation, Resident 3 told inspectors, saying she "does not want to have anything to do with them" and "does not want to deal with them."

Staff members described feeling surveilled during their work. CNA 1 told inspectors she would always see all three residents on the monitor when the tablet was turned on, which the responsible party controlled remotely. "The whole room was on the camera," she said. "CNA 1 would see herself in the camera."

The constant surveillance made staff uncomfortable. "CNA 1 stated it makes them feel weird, the feeling of being watched all the time," according to the inspection report. She noted that residents also "felt weird and invaded their privacy."

LVN 2 stated flatly that "it was not okay to have a camera inside the residents' room, because of privacy issues for residents/roommates."

The facility's own policies prohibited the surveillance setup. A January 2025 policy on resident use of iPads and tablets specifically states that Wi-Fi access is for communication and recreation, with "no unauthorized photos/videos." The facility's April 2023 policy on resident dignity and personal privacy requires care that "respects and enhances each Resident's dignity, individuality, and right to personal privacy."

That policy mandates that staff "examine and treat residents in a manner that maintains their privacy" using closed doors or drawn curtains during personal care procedures. It specifically requires maintaining "Resident's privacy during toileting, bathing, and other activities of personal hygiene."

The responsible party's remote control of the tablet from his house meant the camera could capture residents during these intimate moments without their knowledge or consent.

Resident 3 required substantial or maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, and transfers according to her care assessment. The camera recorded her receiving this intimate care despite her cognitive impairment and inability to meaningfully consent to the surveillance.

The violation affected the sleep and daily functioning of residents who had no choice but to share the surveilled space. Resident 3's complaints about the constant lighting and noise from the responsible party's remote communications with Resident 1 illustrated how the camera installation disrupted basic human needs like rest and quiet.

Federal inspectors determined the facility failed to ensure residents' right to personal privacy, citing the unauthorized camera surveillance that captured residents during toileting, bathing, and other personal activities. The violation was classified as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm to some residents.

The case highlighted how family members' well-intentioned monitoring can violate the rights of vulnerable residents who share living spaces and cannot escape unwanted surveillance.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for South Pasadena Care Center from 2025-09-02 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 20, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER in SOUTH PASADENA, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 2, 2025.

Federal inspectors found the surveillance violated the privacy rights of all three residents during a September 2025 complaint investigation.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER?
Federal inspectors found the surveillance violated the privacy rights of all three residents during a September 2025 complaint investigation.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SOUTH PASADENA, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 555908.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.