Remington Transitional Care: No Diabetic Care Policy - TX
The resident's responsible party told inspectors what happened next: she went to the hospital and learned his blood sugar had dropped dangerously low. Staff at the facility had not been checking it.
That was the first incident.
There was a second. At some point during his stay, the resident, identified in inspection records as Resident #1, also fell. His responsible party said she believed that fall was connected to his low blood sugar as well. By the time inspectors interviewed her during the August 29 complaint investigation, Resident #1 was still hospitalized. He had a fractured back.
Inspectors asked the Director of Nursing for a copy of the facility's policy on diabetic care. The Director of Nursing said there wasn't one.
The facility, she said, followed guidelines from the American Diabetes Association.
What that meant in practice, for Resident #1, was that nobody had been checking his blood sugar. The inspection report does not describe how long the monitoring had lapsed, or how many times staff should have checked and didn't. It does not say how low his glucose dropped before he was sent to the hospital, or how the fall happened, or when. What it records is the outcome: a man with diabetes, a facility with no written policy for managing it, a hospitalization, a fractured back.
Inspectors cited the facility under F0684, which covers the standard that residents receive care consistent with professional standards of practice. The deficiency was tagged at a level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents.
That classification reflects the regulatory scale, not the experience of Resident #1's family. His responsible party was the one who drove to the hospital. She was the one who found out about the blood sugar. She told inspectors about both incidents herself, which is how this complaint came to be investigated at all.
A nursing home without a written diabetic care policy is not a facility that has quietly adopted a better alternative. Blood sugar monitoring in a skilled nursing setting requires coordination across shifts, across staff members who may not know a resident's history, across days and weeks when a resident's condition changes. A written protocol is how that coordination happens consistently. Without one, monitoring depends entirely on individual staff members knowing what to do and remembering to do it, every shift, without a system behind them.
Resident #1's responsible party said the facility was not checking his blood sugars. The Director of Nursing confirmed there was no policy requiring them to.
The inspection was a complaint investigation, meaning someone filed a grievance that triggered it. The report does not identify who filed the complaint, but the responsible party's account of two separate incidents suggests she had been watching this situation deteriorate for some time before inspectors arrived.
Resident #1 was still in the hospital when the inspection closed on August 29. The report does not say whether he was expected to recover from the fractured back, or what his prognosis was, or whether the facility had taken any steps in response to his hospitalization before inspectors showed up.
What it says is that he went to the hospital, that his blood sugar was low, that he fell, and that his back is broken. And that the facility that was supposed to be monitoring his diabetes had never written down how to do it.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Remington Transitional Care of Richardson from 2025-08-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 28, 2026 · Our methodology
REMINGTON TRANSITIONAL CARE OF RICHARDSON in RICHARDSON, TX was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 29, 2025.
The resident's responsible party told inspectors what happened next: she went to the hospital and learned his blood sugar had dropped dangerously low.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.