New Martinsville Health & Rehab: Assessment Failures - WV
The citation fell under a category covering resident assessment and care planning, specifically the requirement that facilities coordinate evaluations with the pre-admission screening and resident review program and refer residents for services when those evaluations indicate a need. Inspectors classified the violation at scope and severity level D, meaning it was isolated in nature and did not produce documented harm, but carried the potential for more than minimal harm to the residents involved.
That distinction matters. A level D citation is often the one that gets overlooked in public reporting, filed away as a technicality, a paperwork problem, something the lawyers handle. But the pre-admission screening and resident review process exists for a specific reason: to identify residents with serious mental illness or intellectual disabilities who may need specialized services that a nursing facility cannot provide, or who may not need nursing home placement at all. When that coordination breaks down, residents can end up in the wrong setting, or in the right setting but without the referrals that would connect them to additional support.
The inspection was triggered by a complaint, not a routine survey cycle. That means someone, a resident, a family member, a staff member, or another party, contacted regulators with a concern specific enough to prompt a visit. The inspection report does not identify who filed the complaint or what it alleged. What it documents is what inspectors found when they arrived.
New Martinsville Health & Rehab reported a correction date of September 19, 2025, roughly three weeks after the inspection concluded. Whether that correction involved updating a single resident's file, retraining staff on the referral process, or something more substantive is not detailed in the publicly available record.
The facility sits in Wetzel County, a rural corner of the northern West Virginia panhandle where access to specialized mental health and disability services is not straightforward. For residents who need those referrals, a delay or a missed coordination step is not an abstraction. It is the difference between getting connected to a service and not getting connected at all.
Five other deficiencies were cited during the same inspection. The report reviewed here covers only the assessment coordination finding, and the full scope of what inspectors documented across all six citations is not reflected in this article. Taken together, six deficiencies in a single complaint inspection represents a facility where multiple systems were not functioning as they should have been on the day inspectors walked through the door.
The August visit was a complaint inspection, which carries its own weight. Routine surveys are scheduled, anticipated, prepared for. A complaint inspection arrives because something already went wrong, or someone believed it did. The fact that inspectors arrived with a specific concern and departed with six citations suggests the problems they found were not confined to whatever prompted the original complaint.
The correction date has passed. Whether the underlying conditions that produced six deficiencies in one visit have actually changed is a question the next inspection will answer.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for New Martinsville Health & Rehab from 2025-08-27 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: October 2, 2026 · Our methodology
NEW MARTINSVILLE HEALTH & REHAB in NEW MARTINSVILLE, WV was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 27, 2025.
A level D citation is often the one that gets overlooked in public reporting, filed away as a technicality, a paperwork problem, something the lawyers handle.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.