Skip to main content
Advertisement

Asbury Care Center: Restraint Chair Violations - TX

Healthcare Facility:

Federal inspectors found Asbury Care Center of Alamo used the specialized chair to prevent Resident #8 from falling after she returned from a hospital stay, but never added this intervention to her official care plan despite facility policy requiring updates when residents experience status changes.

Asbury Care Center of Alamo facility inspection

The resident could escape the chair when it was reclined. CNA F told inspectors Resident #8 "had done so the previous weekend" when the aide worked on the secured unit, forcing staff to stay nearby "to ensure this did not happen."

Advertisement

During observations on August 23, inspectors watched the resident sit calmly in the geriatric chair for 21 minutes, speaking Spanish to other residents who walked by. She was not agitated and made no attempts to leave the chair, which remained upright against the dining table.

Hospice A provided the specialized chair on July 29 after the resident's fall and hospitalization. But the hospice's weekend on-call nurse couldn't explain why the chair was ordered during a telephone interview with inspectors.

The facility's Assistant Director of Nursing said she believed the resident's family wanted her to remain upright, leading hospice to recommend the geriatric chair "so she wouldn't fall." The chair served as a positioning device "to calm her down" according to the MDS Nurse, who admitted during a 11-minute interview that the intervention was never documented.

"The MDS Nurse verified the geriatric chair was not listed as an intervention and she didn't have a reason why it was not added to the care plan," inspectors wrote.

The resident's fall risk care plan had been updated on August 6, adding interventions like keeping her "up at the nurses' station when anxious" and scheduling care coordination with family and hospice. Yet the geriatric chair restraint remained undocumented.

Facility policy explicitly required care plan updates following status changes. The written policy stated: "The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change."

The policy outlined specific steps: nurses must notify the MDS Coordinator and physician when status changes occur. The interdisciplinary team must discuss the resident's condition and collaborate on interventions. Most critically, "the care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions."

None of this happened with the geriatric chair.

The MDS Nurse, who was responsible for maintaining accurate care plans, could not explain the oversight during her interview with inspectors. She confirmed understanding that the chair functioned as both a fall prevention measure and a calming intervention, yet failed to document either purpose.

Staff treated the specialized seating as routine equipment rather than a restraint device requiring careful documentation and monitoring. The chair's dual function as positioning aid and containment system blurred the lines of proper resident care protocols.

The resident's ability to self-extract from the reclined chair when unsupervised highlighted the device's restraint nature. Staff acknowledged this risk by maintaining constant proximity when she occupied the chair, yet this supervision requirement never appeared in formal care documentation.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to document all interventions affecting resident mobility and safety. The undocumented geriatric chair represented a systematic failure to follow established protocols for resident status changes.

The violation affected multiple residents classified under "some" in the inspection report, though details about other cases were not provided. The harm level was rated as minimal, indicating potential rather than actual injury occurred.

Resident #8's case illustrated how informal care decisions can bypass required documentation systems. What began as a hospice recommendation to prevent falls evolved into an undocumented restraint practice that violated facility policy and federal standards.

The inspection revealed a disconnect between frontline care decisions and administrative oversight. While staff understood the chair's practical purpose, the facility's quality assurance systems failed to capture this significant intervention in official records.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Asbury Care Center of Alamo from 2025-08-23 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 25, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

ASBURY CARE CENTER OF ALAMO in SAN ANTONIO, TX was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 23, 2025.

The resident could escape the chair when it was reclined.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at ASBURY CARE CENTER OF ALAMO?
The resident could escape the chair when it was reclined.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SAN ANTONIO, TX, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from ASBURY CARE CENTER OF ALAMO or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 455467.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check ASBURY CARE CENTER OF ALAMO's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.