Skip to main content

Villa at Pine Place: Unsafe Hoyer Lift Transfers - MI

Healthcare Facility
Villa At Pine Place
Clarkston, MI  ·  1/5 stars

The guardian reported this to inspectors during a phone interview on August 21, 2025. They said they had seen the unsafe transfers with their own eyes at Villa at Pine Place, a nursing and rehabilitation facility at 4800 Clintonville Road in Clarkston. They were not speaking in hypotheticals. The resident, identified in inspection records as Resident 8, used a Hoyer lift for all transfers before a fall on July 23, 2025. After that fall, the resident was placed on hospice care.

Resident 8 was entirely dependent on staff for every aspect of personal care. That is not a clinical abstraction. It means that every time this person moved, ate, bathed, or was repositioned in bed, they needed staff to do it for them. The facility's own records confirmed they required two-person assistance for bed mobility. On July 23, a certified nursing assistant identified in the report as CNA AA rolled Resident 8 out of bed during care. Resident 8 fell.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Guardian Z, the resident's legal guardian, told inspectors they had been informed of the fall and did not suspect abuse. They understood it was an accident. But understanding something was an accident does not make the outcome any less serious, and Guardian Z made clear they were concerned. Resident 8's pain had increased since the fall. The guardian said that pain, and what the fall represented about the resident's condition and care, led to the decision to enroll Resident 8 in hospice upon their return to the facility on August 7, 2025.

The fall itself had a documented, specific cause: Resident 8 needed two people to assist with movement in bed. Whether one person was doing the work of two at the time, the inspection record does not say explicitly. What it does say is that CNA AA rolled the resident out of bed, and the resident fell.

A physical therapy evaluation completed on August 7, the day Resident 8 returned to the facility from wherever they had been treated after the fall, found no change in the resident's prior level of function. PT services were not needed. The evaluation did, however, recommend a full body shower sling for bathing and flagged that the resident was at high risk for displacement during transfers. Hospice staff had made recommendations about safe transfers. Inspectors reviewed the documentation and found no plan to educate staff on how to transfer this resident safely. No training plan. No record that anyone had sat down with the aides responsible for this person's care and walked through what the evaluation and hospice team were recommending.

The facility had a safe resident handling policy on the books, dated August 2024, stating that residents would be handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury. It had a fall reduction policy, dated February 2025, stating that each resident would be assessed for fall risk and receive care in accordance with their individualized level of risk. The bed should be locked. The call light should be within reach. These are the written commitments.

What inspectors found on August 21, 2025, was that those commitments had not protected Resident 8. The fall had already happened. The pain was already there. The hospice enrollment had already been made.

The deficiency was cited at the "Actual Harm" level, meaning inspectors determined the failure in care caused real injury to a real person, not a theoretical risk. The regulatory tag, F0689, covers accidents and supervision, the obligation to ensure residents receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents.

Guardian Z's account adds a dimension the paper record alone cannot. They had been present. They had watched staff use the Hoyer lift and watched Resident 8 nearly slide out. They had raised concerns, or at minimum observed what they described as unsafe practice. The inspection report does not indicate that the guardian's prior observations about the lift transfers led to any documented intervention by the facility before July 23. The fall happened anyway.

Resident 8 came back to Villa at Pine Place on August 7 on hospice. The physical therapy team assessed them, noted the high risk for displacement, recommended the shower sling, flagged the transfer concerns. Twelve days later, federal inspectors arrived and found no evidence anyone had used that information to train the staff who would be moving this person every day.

There is a particular cruelty in the sequencing. The evaluation that should have driven action came after the harm. The policies that should have prevented the harm existed before it. And in the space between policy and practice, between evaluation and education, Resident 8 fell out of bed and ended up on hospice with pain that hadn't been there before.

Guardian Z told inspectors they were concerned about the increased pain. That is the last thing the inspection record documents about Resident 8's condition. Not resolution. Not a care plan update that addressed the transfer risks in any documented way. Concern, still unresolved, from the person legally responsible for someone who cannot advocate for themselves, living in a facility where staff had been watched nearly dropping them from a mechanical lift.

The inspection was completed August 21, 2025. The deficiency was one of the most serious categories the rating system uses. The facility's address is 4800 Clintonville Road. The guardian's phone was still ringing with questions about a fall that had happened almost a month before anyone with federal authority showed up to ask.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Villa At Pine Place from 2025-08-21 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources


Editorial Standards

Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: July 2, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

Villa at Pine Place in Clarkston, MI was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 21, 2025.

The guardian reported this to inspectors during a phone interview on August 21, 2025.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Villa at Pine Place?
The guardian reported this to inspectors during a phone interview on August 21, 2025.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in Clarkston, MI, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Villa at Pine Place or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 235461.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Villa at Pine Place's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.


Advertisement