Federal inspectors documented the privacy violations during unannounced observations on August 21, finding staff failed to properly shield residents during perineal care and diaper changes. The failures affected residents with cognitive impairments who required substantial assistance with personal care.

At 2:29 PM, inspectors watched Certified Nursing Assistant 1 close a privacy curtain around Resident 1's bed but leave a gap of two to three feet from the wall. The nursing assistant and a treatment nurse then performed perineal care and changed the resident's diaper while the person remained visible to anyone entering the room.
Resident 1 had been admitted nine days earlier with high blood pressure and diabetes. Assessment records showed the person had moderately impaired cognitive skills and required partial assistance with toileting and personal hygiene.
Less than half an hour later, inspectors observed a nearly identical violation in another room. At 2:57 PM, two nursing assistants informed Resident 3 they would change the person's diaper. CNA 1 closed the privacy curtain but left a two-foot gap.
The nursing assistant proceeded with perineal care while Resident 3's genital area remained visible to anyone entering the room.
Resident 3 had lived at the facility for two months after admission with Alzheimer's disease. Records showed the person suffered from short- and long-term memory problems, moderately impaired cognitive skills, and required partial assistance with toileting and personal hygiene.
Both residents required substantial help with dressing and putting on footwear, indicating significant physical limitations that would make self-advocacy difficult during care procedures.
When inspectors interviewed the Director of Staff Development at 4:20 PM, the administrator acknowledged privacy curtains must be completely closed during any resident care activity. The director stated privacy during care activities promotes residents' dignity.
The facility's own policy on perineal care, dated March 2023, explicitly requires staff to "promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures."
Yet nursing assistants violated this basic standard twice in the span of 28 minutes during the inspection, suggesting the privacy failures were routine practice rather than isolated incidents.
The violations occurred during some of the most intimate care nursing home residents receive. Perineal care involves cleaning and maintaining the area between the anus and genitals, typically performed multiple times daily for residents who wear incontinence briefs.
Federal regulations require facilities to honor residents' right to dignified existence and self-determination. The inspection found these privacy failures had the potential to cause embarrassment and loss of self-esteem for residents already vulnerable due to cognitive impairments and physical dependencies.
For Resident 1, the diabetes diagnosis creates additional concerns about wound healing and infection risk, making proper intimate care even more critical. The person's moderately impaired cognitive skills would limit ability to understand or object to the privacy violation.
Resident 3's Alzheimer's disease and memory problems create similar vulnerabilities. The progressive nature of the disease means the person's ability to advocate for basic dignity continues to decline over time.
The timing of the violations during a federal inspection raises questions about routine privacy practices when inspectors are not present. If staff failed to properly close curtains while under regulatory scrutiny, the frequency of such violations during normal operations could be significantly higher.
Both nursing assistants appeared to believe partially closed curtains provided adequate privacy, despite facility policy requiring complete closure. The gap between policy and practice suggests inadequate training or supervision of staff responsible for the most intimate aspects of resident care.
The violations affected residents with different lengths of stay and care needs, indicating the privacy failures were not isolated to specific units or care teams. Resident 1 had been at the facility for nine days, while Resident 3 had lived there for more than two months.
Federal inspectors classified the violations as having minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. However, the dignity violations occurred during basic daily care that these residents receive multiple times each day.
The facility's failure to ensure privacy during intimate care represents a fundamental breakdown in protecting residents' basic human dignity during their most vulnerable moments.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Chino Valley Health Care Cente from 2025-08-21 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Chino Valley Health Care Cente
- Browse all CA nursing home inspections