Skip to main content

Benedictine Care Community: Bathing Failures Documented - MN

Healthcare Facility
Benedictine Care Community
Ada, MN  ·  1/5 stars

The inspection, completed August 21, 2025, was triggered by a complaint. What investigators found was a bathing program that staff tracked loosely, documented inconsistently, and apparently failed to deliver reliably to at least some of the people living there.

The resident, identified in the report as R2, first appeared in facility records as a concern in July. Minutes from a resident council meeting on July 8, 2025, noted that R2 had told staff she was not receiving one bath a week. Other residents at the same meeting were asking why they couldn't have more than one. The minutes recorded the concern. They showed no follow-up.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Five weeks later, on August 12, 2025, R2 brought it up again. The council minutes from that meeting recorded that she had not received her bath on her scheduled bath day, that she had spent the whole day in her nightgown, and that she wanted to know if she would be getting a bath. Again, the minutes showed no follow-up.

The facility's own bathing standard called for at least one bath per week. Nurses were expected to complete a weekly skin assessment and note when a bath had been given. Nursing assistants were supposed to mark a bath sheet kept at the nurses' station. According to the inspection report, there were times when those sheets were marked and filed, though staff were uncertain how long they had been kept that way.

What the report describes is a system where the responsibility for tracking baths rested with staff, and where that responsibility was not reliably met. A facility administrator acknowledged that bathing mattered for personal hygiene and skin health, and that oily hair could affect a resident's dignity. The administrator said they had not heard residents complain about lack of bathing, only a family member.

The resident council minutes told a different story.

R2 had raised the issue herself, in a group setting, twice in five weeks. Both times it was written down. Both times nothing happened. She sat in her nightgown for a day waiting, and the written record of that fact produced no documented response.

The inspection report categorized the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, and noted that some residents were affected. The harm category reflects a regulatory floor, not a ceiling on what the experience meant to the people living through it.

Bathing is not a comfort amenity. Skin integrity in older adults depends on it. Infections can take hold in skin that goes unwashed. Dignity, for people who cannot bathe themselves and rely entirely on staff to do it, is bound up in whether someone shows up.

R2 could not bathe herself. She waited. She said something. She waited again. She said something again. The facility's own minutes recorded both moments, and the silence that followed each one.

The inspection report does not say whether R2 eventually received her bath on August 12. It does not say whether her skin was assessed after the missed bath day. It records what she asked, and what the facility did not do.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Benedictine Care Community from 2025-08-21 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources


Editorial Standards

Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: July 2, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

Benedictine Care Community in ADA, MN was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 21, 2025.

The inspection, completed August 21, 2025, was triggered by a complaint.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Benedictine Care Community?
The inspection, completed August 21, 2025, was triggered by a complaint.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in ADA, MN, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Benedictine Care Community or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 245502.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Benedictine Care Community's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.


Advertisement