State inspectors found Massena Rehabilitation & Nursing Center failed to properly evaluate three residents before installing mobility bars on their beds. The facility's own staff admitted they didn't know which residents had the equipment or when it was appropriate to use.
Registered Nurse Unit Manager #36 discovered during the inspection that they weren't even aware resident #4 had mobility bars. "They should have had a related care plan prior to 8/15/2025 as well as a consent," the manager acknowledged.
The confusion extended throughout the nursing staff. Certified Nurse Aide #21 explained that enabler bars were zip-tied "if the resident was not care planned to have them." But when inspectors checked, they found resident #30's rails were positioned in a way that made them unusable anyway.
Resident #30, who has kidney disease and severely impaired cognition, had two mismatched bilateral bed rails zip-tied in the up position at the head of the bed. During observations on August 11 and August 14, inspectors watched the resident sit on the edge of the bed and lie down without using the rails at all.
The resident's care plan from December 2022 called for "2 enabler bars" and a physician had ordered "bilateral enabler bars to enhance mobility" in April. But there was no bed rail assessment or consent documented anywhere in the file.
Staff seemed unclear about their own policies. Licensed Practical Nurse #20 said bed rails "should be listed in the care plan and be zip tied." They thought if there wasn't a zip tie, "then the resident could use the bar as an enabler." But they couldn't explain why a bed with two bars only had one zip-tied.
The confusion had real consequences for resident safety. Certified Nurse Aide #4 said resident #126's rails "were supposed to be strapped but they were not, so the mattress moved all over."
Resident #126, who suffered a stroke with left-sided weakness, had moderately impaired cognition and required moderate assistance for bed mobility. Their comprehensive care plan called for "2 bed enablers" and extensive assistance for turning and repositioning.
Yet a physical therapist's discharge summary from April noted the resident required only minimal assistance for bed mobility "without the use of side rails." No documentation explained why rails were recommended despite this assessment.
The maintenance staff responsible for installing the equipment lacked basic safety training. Maintenance Technician #2 said they installed bed rails "if physical therapy told them to" and checked for rusty bolts and broken parts. But they "did not know about entrapment zones, what entrapment meant, and had not had any related training."
Entrapment between bed rails and mattresses has caused deaths in nursing homes when residents become wedged in gaps and cannot free themselves.
The Rehabilitation Director tried to clarify the facility's approach during the inspection. They said zip ties were used "so the bars could not be put down" because "if they were down, then they were considered siderails." The zip ties supposedly prevented rails from becoming restraints.
"Any rail that was on a bed should be zip tied," the director stated, suggesting this was standard practice throughout the facility.
But the system wasn't working. Staff couldn't identify which residents needed assessments, care plans contradicted therapy recommendations, and equipment was installed without proper documentation.
The facility's approach appeared designed to avoid federal regulations governing bed rail use, which require comprehensive assessments of fall risk, cognitive status, and potential for entrapment. By zip-tying rails in fixed positions, staff may have believed they were creating "enablers" rather than "siderails."
However, any raised surface along a bed that could prevent a resident from getting out freely functions as a restraint, regardless of what staff call it or how it's secured.
The inspection found residents with significant cognitive impairments and mobility limitations had equipment installed without their consent or proper evaluation of risks and benefits. Staff at multiple levels admitted confusion about basic safety protocols.
Resident #30 continues living with mismatched rails that serve no apparent purpose, while resident #126 deals with an unstable mattress because their rails weren't properly secured. Both residents depend on staff who acknowledged they don't fully understand the equipment they're responsible for maintaining.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Massena Rehabilitation & Nursing Center from 2025-08-15 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Massena Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
- Browse all NY nursing home inspections