The highly contagious gastrointestinal illness caused nausea, vomiting and diarrhea among residents and workers during the May 2025 outbreak. Federal inspectors determined the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance committee failed to include the infection preventionist as a required member, undermining the team's ability to identify infection control problems before they escalated.
Staff F, the facility's infection preventionist, told inspectors on May 22 that she had not participated in any quality committee meetings despite being required by federal regulations. She acknowledged the committee was not monitoring infection control practices for trends and had no infection control improvement projects underway.
The quality committee's own meeting minutes revealed the systematic exclusion. From July 2024 through April 2025, signature sheets showed no documentation that the infection preventionist attended meetings. Even when the committee identified a soft tissue infection trend in October 2024, no infection prevention data was presented and the specialist remained absent.
The facility's April 2024 policy clearly stated the quality committee must include "the infection preventionist" among required members, along with the administrator, director of nursing, a physician and three additional staff responsible for direct resident care.
But the reality differed sharply from policy.
Meeting minutes from July 21, 2024 showed no input from the infection preventionist on infection prevention and control data. The January 21, 2025 meeting similarly lacked any infection control analysis. The April 30, 2025 meeting, held just days before the norovirus outbreak began, again proceeded without the infection specialist's participation.
The outbreak started May 3, 2025, according to the facility's gastrointestinal outbreak line listing. Initially, the facility documented 24 residents and 25 staff with symptoms. By the time federal inspectors arrived May 23, the numbers had grown to 27 residents and 33 staff members affected.
Administrator Staff A and Director of Nursing Staff B acknowledged during a May 23 interview that they were aware of the survey team's concerns but had attempted no corrective action except for falls. Staff B explained they had initiated a performance improvement project for falls that included weekly meetings, but admitted it was ineffective and needed drastic revision.
Director of Clinical Services Staff Q noted the facility had experienced leadership changes, with a new administrator and resource nurse starting May 1, 2025 — just two days before the norovirus outbreak began.
The timing highlighted the consequences of the quality committee's dysfunction. For months, the facility operated without meaningful infection control oversight in its primary quality improvement process. When norovirus struck, nearly half the residents and a third of the staff fell ill with the highly contagious disease.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain quality assurance committees that meet at least quarterly with specific required members, including infection preventionists. These committees serve as early warning systems, identifying problems before they harm residents.
Staff F's interview revealed the depth of the quality breakdown. She told inspectors she was not monitoring infection control practices for trends — a fundamental responsibility for someone in her position. Without trend monitoring, facilities cannot identify patterns that might predict outbreaks or other infection control failures.
The infection preventionist's absence from quality meetings meant critical infection data never reached facility leadership. Even when the October 2024 meeting identified soft tissue infections as a concern, no infection control expertise guided the discussion or response.
The facility's own policy recognized the infection preventionist as essential to quality assurance, describing the committee as serving "a preventative function by reviewing and improving facility systems" to enhance care quality. But prevention requires participation.
The outbreak line listing documented the human cost of these systematic failures. Twenty-seven residents experienced the misery of norovirus symptoms — violent nausea, vomiting and diarrhea that can be particularly dangerous for elderly residents with underlying health conditions. Thirty-three staff members also contracted the illness, potentially compromising care delivery during the outbreak.
Norovirus spreads rapidly in closed environments like nursing homes, making early detection and response critical. The facility's quality committee, meeting quarterly without infection control input, missed opportunities to strengthen prevention measures before the outbreak struck.
The May 23 inspection revealed a quality assurance system that existed on paper but failed in practice. Meeting minutes showed a committee going through motions without essential expertise. Policy required infection preventionist participation, but reality showed empty signature lines and absent voices.
Staff B, the director of nursing, acknowledged the quality improvement process needed revision. But this admission came only after federal inspectors identified the failures and after 60 people had already fallen ill with a highly contagious disease that proper oversight might have prevented.
The facility's quality committee met its technical requirement of quarterly meetings. It maintained minutes and signature sheets as regulations demanded. But it systematically excluded the very expertise needed to prevent the outbreak that ultimately sickened nearly half its residents.
Twenty-seven residents experienced days of illness that proper infection control oversight might have prevented. Thirty-three staff members contracted norovirus while caring for residents who were also sick. The quality assurance system designed to protect them had failed at the most basic level — including the right people in the room.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Colville Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia from 2025-05-23 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Colville Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia
- Browse all WA nursing home inspections
