Skip to main content
Advertisement

Claremont Care Center: Pain Assessment Failures - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The 83-year-old patient, identified as Resident 1 in inspection records, had been admitted to Claremont Care Center following a fall that fractured his right femur. He required surgical repair and had moderately impaired cognition, along with generalized muscle weakness that left him needing substantial assistance with basic activities.

Claremont Care Center facility inspection

His care plan specifically instructed staff to "respond immediately to any complaint of pain" and monitor for hip fracture complications including unrelieved pain. Physician orders required licensed nurses to assess his pain level every shift using a 0-to-10 scale.

Advertisement

But when the resident reported pain levels of 7 and 8 out of 10 on multiple occasions in April, nurses administered hydrocodone without documenting where he hurt.

On April 7, during a physical therapy session, the resident complained of discomfort in his lower extremity despite being pre-medicated for the session. Physical Therapist 1 noted the resident "refused to attempt standing or getting out of bed and began to exhibit agitation," wanting to return to bed due to "complaints of persistent pain."

The therapist walked to the nurses' station to inform LVN 4 about the resident's discomfort. LVN 4 agreed to monitor the patient.

No pain medication was given that day. No assessment was documented.

Two days later, on April 9 at 10:32 AM, a nurse administered hydrocodone for a pain level of 8 out of 10. The medication record showed no indication of where the resident hurt.

The pattern continued. On April 14, the resident received hydrocodone twice — once at 8:56 AM for pain level 8, again at 8:09 PM for pain level 7. On April 16 at 8:20 AM, another dose for pain level 7. On April 17 at 8:18 AM, another dose for pain level 7.

Each time, nurses failed to document the location of his pain.

"It was important for licensed nurses to document thoroughly such as the location of resident's pain to provide appropriate care, treatment, and notify the doctor if necessary," the facility's MDS Nurse told inspectors during a May 6 interview.

LVN 1, who administered the pain medication on four of those occasions, acknowledged the failures during a May 7 interview. She told inspectors that when residents report pain, she should ask about location, intensity, onset, and triggers.

"LVN 1 failed to document the location of Resident 1's pain which put Resident 1 at risk for missed or delayed diagnosis, inappropriate treatment, ineffective pain relief, and delay in timely interventions which can further worsen any injury residents may have," according to the inspection report.

The nurse said she could not recall where the resident's pain was located.

Adding to the documentation problems, Physical Therapist 1 had initially recorded the wrong location of the resident's pain in her April 7 notes. She documented pain in the left lower extremity, but later sent an email correction stating the pain was actually in the right lower extremity — the side of his hip fracture.

"There was a possibility PT 1 may have written the wrong laterality of Resident 1's pain location," the therapist told inspectors.

LVN 4, who was supposed to monitor the resident after the therapist's report on April 7, told inspectors she could not remember being informed about the resident's pain or providing any interventions that day.

The facility's Assistant Director of Nursing explained that nurses should assess pain level, location, intensity, and determine if pain is new or chronic. "Failure to properly assess the resident's complaint of pain can result in untreated pain, delayed or missed interventions, decline in physical function, and complications from over or under medication."

The facility's own pain management policy, revised in January 2022, requires care plans to "reflect the location and type of pain" and mandates that staff "monitor pain status and treatment effects on a regular basis."

Another policy from October 2024 instructs nurses to "complete appropriate physical assessment to determine any physical changes or manifestations as needed" and "consult physician for additional interventions if pain is not relieved."

None of this happened for the hip fracture patient whose pain complaints went undocumented through April, leaving a medical record that inspectors found contained "inaccurate and incomplete information" with the potential to affect his care.

The resident required substantial assistance for basic movements including rolling in bed, sitting up, and toilet transfers. He had not attempted to walk ten feet due to medical conditions and safety concerns.

His wife had reduced her work hours to help care for him after his amputation following a previous nursing home stay, according to his medical history.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Claremont Care Center from 2025-05-07 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

CLAREMONT CARE CENTER in POMONA, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on May 7, 2025.

Physician orders required licensed nurses to assess his pain level every shift using a 0-to-10 scale.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at CLAREMONT CARE CENTER?
Physician orders required licensed nurses to assess his pain level every shift using a 0-to-10 scale.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in POMONA, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from CLAREMONT CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 055394.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check CLAREMONT CARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.