Woodland Care Center: Theft Allegation Unreported - CA
The missing money belonged to Resident 38. The Social Service Assistant who filed the internal Theft/Loss Report in October 2024 told inspectors she initiated the paperwork herself after the resident's money turned up missing. The amount, she said, varied. There was no documentation in the resident's inventory that he had ever possessed money, and no money was observed by staff among his belongings. Whether anyone had taken it, and how much there was to take, remained unclear.
What was not unclear was what happened next. Nothing.
The administrator reviewed the same Theft/Loss Report with inspectors on April 11 and confirmed the sequence of events himself. The allegation of misappropriation was investigated in October 2024. It was deemed unsubstantiated. No money was returned to Resident 38. And the administrator acknowledged, directly, that he had not reported the allegation to the California Department of Public Health, to the ombudsman, or to any law enforcement agency.
The resident had been told his money would be returned. It was not.
The facility's own policy, last reviewed just three months before inspectors arrived, laid out the obligations in plain language. When a suspected case of staff misappropriation is reported, the administrator is required to notify the state licensing agency, the ombudsman, a resident representative, Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement within 24 hours. After the investigation concludes, the results go to the local police department, the ombudsman, and the state survey agency within five working days.
The administrator did none of it.
The inspection report does not say whether the administrator was unaware of the policy his facility had reviewed in January 2025, or whether he knew and chose not to act. It does not say whether anyone at the facility ever told Resident 38's family. It does not identify who told the resident his money would be returned, or when that promise was made.
What the report does say is that the Social Service Assistant found no documentation the resident had money in the first place. That detail cuts two ways. It could mean the allegation was genuinely difficult to substantiate. It could also mean that if a resident's cash was quietly taken, the absence of documentation made it easier to close the case and move on.
CMS classified the harm level as minimal, and described the number of residents affected as few. Those are regulatory categories, not moral ones. Resident 38 is a person who reported that money was taken from him, was told it would come back, and is still waiting.
The deficiency falls under federal rules requiring nursing homes to protect residents from misappropriation of property and to report allegations through the appropriate channels. Inspectors documented that Woodland Care Center failed on the reporting side, regardless of whether the underlying theft ever occurred.
The facility has 99 certified beds and is located at 7120 Corbin Ave. in Reseda. The inspection was completed April 11, 2025.
There is no indication in the inspection record that the administrator has since filed a report with CDPH, the ombudsman, or local law enforcement. There is no indication that Resident 38 has received his money.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Woodland Care Center from 2025-04-11 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Corrections: We strive for accuracy in everything we publish. If you believe any fact in this article is incorrect, please contact us with details, and we will review and correct it promptly.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: October 30, 2026 · Our methodology
WOODLAND CARE CENTER in RESEDA, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on April 11, 2025.
The missing money belonged to Resident 38.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.