Grand Trace Health and Rehabilitation: Supply Shortages - MS
When inspectors arrived at Grand Trace Health and Rehabilitation on March 27th, they found a facility that had been running short on the most basic supplies for caring for incontinent residents, some of them bariatric, for at least a month. The supply list from March 15th specifically called out yellow diapers sized 58 to 73 inches, blue diapers sized 46 to 62 inches, bariatric white diapers, and gloves in medium and large. These were not specialty items. They were the daily materials staff needed to keep residents clean and dry.
The interim administrator, three weeks into the job, said he had no idea there was a problem.
He told inspectors he had approved only one supply order since taking over, and that his expectation was for the facility to always have appropriate supplies on hand to provide quality care and maintain residents' dignity. He later signed a statement saying the facility followed its own policy in this area. The supply lists sitting in the records told a different story.
The paper trail stretched back to late February. A supplier invoice dated February 28th showed an order for two cases of large gloves, two cases of medium gloves, and multiple cases of briefs in 2XL and 3XL sizes. A purchase order from March 3rd added four cases each of large gloves, medium gloves, large briefs, and 3XL briefs. A third purchase order, dated March 13th, included one case of 3XL briefs and eight packs of additional incontinence products, but no gloves at all.
Three separate orders over two weeks, and residents were still going without.
Central supply staff offered an explanation when inspectors interviewed them that afternoon. The director of nursing, they said, had misplaced the inventory list. That delay, they suggested, had pushed back the ordering process. No one explained why the gap between identifying missing supplies on March 1st and restocking them had stretched past March 27th, the day inspectors walked through the door.
Gloves matter beyond comfort. They are what staff pull on before helping a resident to the toilet, before changing a brief, before any hands-on care. Running out of them does not pause the work. It changes how the work gets done, or whether it gets done properly at all.
The interim administrator's signed statement, reviewed by inspectors, concluded that the facility was following policy. The supply lists, the purchase orders, and the empty shelves were all part of the same record he signed off on.
Inspectors classified the violation at the level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, meaning no resident was documented as having suffered a specific injury directly tied to the shortage. Some residents were affected. The report does not say how many, or for how long they waited.
What it does say is that on March 1st, staff knew the shelves were bare. On March 15th, they were still writing down what they needed. On March 27th, inspectors arrived and found the same gaps still being documented, still being ordered around, still unresolved after nearly a month of purchase orders that had not caught up to the need.
The director of nursing, whose misplaced inventory list central supply staff said started the delay, is not named in the inspection report. The interim administrator, who said he expected supplies to always be available, had been in his role for three weeks when inspectors sat down with him. He had approved one order.
The residents who needed the diapers and gloves are not named either.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Grand Trace Health and Rehabilitation from 2025-03-27 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Corrections: We strive for accuracy in everything we publish. If you believe any fact in this article is incorrect, please contact us with details, and we will review and correct it promptly.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: October 31, 2026 · Our methodology
GRAND TRACE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION in NATCHEZ, MS was cited for violations during a health inspection on March 27, 2025.
These were not specialty items.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.