Hillcrest Commons: Food Allergen Safety Failures - MA

The March inspection at Hillcrest Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center found that despite tracking allergy accuracy rates that never reached their 100 percent goal, residents continued receiving foods that could trigger allergic reactions. The facility's performance improvement plan, launched in August 2024, had seen accuracy rates fluctuate between 90 and 96.3 percent through February 2025.

During the survey period, inspectors documented multiple allergy violations. On March 19, Resident #163 was being assisted with lunch when a surveyor spotted a pureed chocolate dessert on the resident's meal tray. The resident's documented allergies included chocolate flavoring, chocolate, and cocoa. The unit manager had to intervene to remove the dessert.

Five days later, Resident #215 told inspectors he had received a coconut-containing dessert at lunch, despite being allergic to coconut. Nurse #7 confirmed the allergy, assessed the resident, and offered Benadryl.

The facility houses 27 residents identified as having food allergies.

The Food Services Supervisor acknowledged during interviews that allergens being served on meal trays "had been an ongoing issue within the facility." Records show the improvement plan had run for six months without achieving its safety goal, with accuracy rates actually declining in some months.

October 2024 showed 91.7 percent accuracy, down from September's 95.5 percent. November dropped to 90 percent. December improved to 94.7 percent, January reached 96.3 percent, but February fell back to 93.6 percent.

The facility's corrective actions remained largely unchanged throughout the six-month period: continue tray audits, highlight allergies in different colors on meal tickets, and implement a new cart system placing allergy trays first. No target dates were established for achieving 100 percent accuracy. The facility provided no audit tools to document how they reached their monthly percentages, and no in-service training documentation was available until March.

The Food Service Director said their auditing process checked only ten meal trays randomly during each meal. When asked about the adequacy of this approach given the known allergy problem, both the director and supervisor admitted they "risked missing a tray of a resident who did have allergies" and should have been monitoring all allergy trays before they left the kitchen.

"The PIP was not effective and due to the severity of the concern being addressed in the PIP he would have expected the goal for the project to only have been one month," the Food Service Director told inspectors. The fact that it had continued for months without resolution was "concerning and put residents at risk for having an allergic reaction."

The administrator acknowledged the allergy improvement plan "had not been effective and the team needed to take a deeper look into the problem."

Kitchen sanitation problems compounded food safety concerns. Initial inspection on March 18 found unlabeled and undated raw hamburger and cut-up chicken thawed in the walk-in refrigerator. The industrial can opener had "built up black thick debris on the blade," and the slicer contained "light colored debris on the blade and surrounding parts of the machine."

A large flour bin was "tacky to the touch and was visibly dirty on the outside," with no labels or dates. The kitchen window behind the steam table was open without a screen.

During a follow-up inspection March 25, the flour bin remained dirty and the slicer still had debris despite claims it had been cleaned after previous use. Two fans in the dish room were "dust laden," with one located where clean dishware was stored.

The dish machine presented additional safety concerns. After running several racks, the wash temperature measured 140 degrees Fahrenheit, well below the required 160-degree minimum. The Food Service Director said the machine should not be used and contacted the vendor for repair instructions.

A separate infection control violation showed delayed response to gastrointestinal symptoms. Resident #209 began experiencing nausea and vomiting on the evening of March 19, but contact precautions were not implemented until the afternoon of March 20. During that delay, the resident attended a bingo activity with eight other residents without wearing a mask.

The Infection Preventionist admitted the resident "should have been placed on Contact Precaution as soon as his/her symptoms were identified on 3/19/25 to avoid the spread of the virus" and "should not have attended the bingo activity with other residents."

The delayed response contributed to an outbreak affecting 16 residents across four units, with one resident requiring hospitalization. Six residents on Unit 2 developed symptoms, along with seven on Unit 4, one on Unit 3, and one on Unit 1.

The facility also failed to provide a required pneumococcal vaccination to Resident #25, who had signed consent for the PCV20 immunization in June 2024 but never received it. CDC guidelines recommend the vaccination within one year of a previous pneumococcal shot, which this resident had received in February 2021.

The Infection Preventionist said residents "should be immunized within seven days of consent being signed" and that Resident #25 "should have been administered the PCV20 in June 2024 when the Resident had signed the consent form but was not administered the vaccine."

The Director of Nursing confirmed the resident "was due for PCV 20 immunization at the time of admission to the facility in June 2024" but had not received it despite signing consent nine months earlier.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Hillcrest Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center from 2025-03-25 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

• View all inspection reports for Hillcrest Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
• Browse all MA nursing home inspections