Skip to main content
Advertisement

Franciscan Woods: Wound Care Delays, Weight Loss - WI

Healthcare Facility:

The three-day delay at Franciscan Woods violated the facility's own policies and left the resident without proper treatment orders for her reopened wound. The resident, identified as R8, spent most of her time sitting in a recliner on pillows, avoiding her bed and declining the wheelchair cushion staff offered.

Franciscan Woods facility inspection

"She prefers to sit on a pillow due to pressure injuries developing on her buttocks," R8 told inspectors during a March 18 interview. The cognitively intact resident had previously healed from a similar wound in the same location, which had closed by February 20 but reopened within three weeks.

Advertisement

Federal inspectors found that certified nursing assistant CNA-T notified a nurse immediately after finding the wound during R8's bath. But no comprehensive assessment was completed that day or the next. Instead, facility staff performed a "skin sweep" on March 12 — using a separate electronic system that floor nurses couldn't access.

The unit manager acknowledged that comprehensive assessments should be completed "right away" but claimed the facility had 24 hours to complete them. When pressed about the three-day gap, she said she would investigate.

Meanwhile, the wound grew larger. By March 20, the injury measured 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.1 centimeters, compared to 0.2 x 0.2 x 0.1 when first properly assessed on March 13. The wound care nurse practitioner attributed the growth to "noncompliance" — R8's refusal to sleep in her bed or use proper cushioning.

R8 also missed wound care treatments on March 15 and declined them on March 16, going two days without care for her stage 2 injury.

The facility's wound care failures extended beyond delayed assessments. Another resident, R6, experienced severe weight loss that contributed to pressure injury development, but staff implemented no new interventions to address the decline.

R6 lost 24 pounds over six months, dropping from 131 pounds in July 2024 to 107 pounds by January 2025 — an 18.3% weight loss. The resident with severe cognitive impairment required total assistance with eating and had been stable for years before the decline began.

The facility's registered dietitian repeatedly documented R6's weight as "stable" in quarterly assessments even as the pounds disappeared. In September, when R6 weighed 120.8 pounds — down from 131 in July — the dietitian wrote: "Weight 120.8 pounds, stable the past 6 months. No new interventions needed at this time."

The pattern continued in November. With R6 at 118 pounds, the dietitian again noted: "Weight 118 pounds, stable the past 6 months. No new interventions needed."

Only after R6's weight plummeted to 107 pounds did staff acknowledge "significant weight loss" and begin hospice discussions. By then, R6 had developed pressure injuries on both heels, including one that progressed to stage 3.

The facility's medical director, who makes rounds at several locations, wasn't directly notified of R6's weight loss. "Staff should contact the on-site NP who will then contact MD-Z if there are concerns," he told inspectors. He last saw R6 in February and knew about the 10-pound monthly loss but expected decline given R6's advanced dementia.

R6's power of attorney said the weight loss had been mentioned only "casually" by staff. She brought food from home that R6 ate without difficulty and worried that poor nutrition affected her mother's skin integrity.

Meal documentation revealed gaps in care. In January 2025, staff failed to record whether R6 was offered 44 of 93 meals, leaving no evidence that the totally dependent resident received proper nutrition assistance.

The facility's infection control program also showed deficiencies. During a February influenza A outbreak affecting 14 residents on the third floor, staff created a line list but never completed an investigative summary to identify how the outbreak started or spread.

The infection preventionist acknowledged not documenting investigation summaries for outbreaks and failed to track infection organisms unless they were reportable to health authorities. Surveillance logs listed infections but omitted the specific organisms causing them, hampering prevention efforts.

Director of Nursing B told inspectors she wasn't aware of R6's weight loss issues and said nursing wouldn't typically be involved in nutrition interventions. She couldn't explain why the facility's dietitian consistently documented declining weights as "stable."

The inspection also found that staff installed bed rails on R9's bed at family request without completing the required comprehensive assessment. The device evaluation form was marked "no device needed" despite bilateral mobility devices being installed and maintained on the bed.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Franciscan Woods from 2025-03-20 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 20, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

FRANCISCAN WOODS in BROOKFIELD, WI was cited for violations during a health inspection on March 20, 2025.

The three-day delay at Franciscan Woods violated the facility's own policies and left the resident without proper treatment orders for her reopened wound.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at FRANCISCAN WOODS?
The three-day delay at Franciscan Woods violated the facility's own policies and left the resident without proper treatment orders for her reopened wound.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in BROOKFIELD, WI, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from FRANCISCAN WOODS or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 525528.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check FRANCISCAN WOODS's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.