Skip to main content
Advertisement

Roo-lan Healthcare: CPR Protocol Failures - WA

Healthcare Facility:

LACEY, WA - Federal inspectors determined immediate jeopardy conditions existed at Roo-lan Healthcare Center after staff failed to perform CPR on a resident whose medical directives explicitly requested full resuscitation efforts.

Roo-lan Healthcare Center facility inspection

Emergency Response Protocol Breakdown

The March 12, 2025 inspection revealed systemic failures in the facility's emergency response procedures when staff discovered an unresponsive resident but failed to initiate life-saving measures. The resident, who had been admitted with bladder cancer and diabetes, possessed a valid Physicians Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form specifically requesting CPR and full medical intervention.

Advertisement

According to inspection documents, a Certified Nursing Assistant found the resident unresponsive around 11:50 PM but left to find a nurse rather than beginning CPR. Licensed Practical Nurse Staff C assessed the situation but also failed to initiate resuscitation efforts, instead leaving the bedside to locate another nurse for consultation.

The facility's own Medical Emergency Response policy clearly states that trained employees who witness medical emergencies must "initiate immediate action, including CPR as appropriate" and that CPR should continue unless a Do Not Resuscitate order exists or there are obvious signs of clinical death.

Critical Communication Failures

Investigation revealed concerning gaps in staff knowledge regarding the resident's care preferences. Staff C, the licensed nurse responsible for the resident that night, told investigators: "I thought they changed his code status." However, facility records confirmed no such change had been documented, and the resident's POLST remained valid, requesting full resuscitation efforts including CPR, intubation, mechanical ventilation, and hospital transfer.

The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing acknowledged during interviews that "CPR was not initiated and 911 was not notified and the facility did not follow their emergency response protocol." They confirmed the resident expired at the facility without receiving the emergency interventions specified in his medical directives.

Widespread Training Deficiencies

The inspection uncovered additional systemic problems with staff preparedness. Facility leadership admitted that "numerous staff did not have current CPR certification" during their internal investigation. Most concerning, the Registered Nurse who was consulted during the emergency (Staff E) could not be verified as having valid CPR certification, as certification records were not on file and the staff member did not respond to calls from either the facility or state surveyors.

CPR certification represents a fundamental requirement for nursing facility staff, as cardiac emergencies can occur without warning in elderly populations with complex medical conditions. When staff lack proper training or fail to follow established protocols, residents face increased risk of preventable death or severe complications.

Medical Standards and Best Practices

Emergency response in nursing facilities requires immediate assessment and intervention. When a resident is found unresponsive, trained staff should immediately check for responsiveness, breathing, and pulse. If these vital signs are absent and no contraindications exist, CPR must begin within seconds to maximize the chance of successful resuscitation.

The resident's medical history of bladder cancer and diabetes placed him at elevated risk for various complications, but neither condition would automatically contraindicate resuscitation efforts. His POLST form demonstrated informed decision-making about end-of-life preferences, specifically choosing aggressive intervention rather than comfort-only care.

Federal regulations require nursing facilities to provide basic life support including CPR prior to emergency medical services arrival, unless residents have valid advance directives refusing such care. The facility's own policies aligned with these requirements but were not followed during this critical incident.

Regulatory Response and Corrections

The immediate jeopardy determination began on the date of the incident when proper CPR protocols were not followed. Federal surveyors noted the facility's failure "placed residents at risk for serious injury, harm, impairment or death." The immediate jeopardy status was later removed after the facility implemented corrective measures including staff education, verification of CPR certifications, and staff interviews confirming understanding of revised procedures.

The corrective actions required the facility to ensure all staff obtained active CPR certifications and received comprehensive training on emergency response policies. Surveyors verified these systems were in place to "safeguard, protect and prevent" similar incidents affecting residents who require CPR intervention.

Impact on Resident Care Quality

This incident highlights critical vulnerabilities in emergency preparedness that can affect any nursing facility resident. When staff are uncertain about care directives or lack current certifications, the window for effective intervention rapidly closes during medical emergencies.

The failure to follow established protocols not only violated federal regulations but also represented a breakdown in the fundamental duty to provide appropriate medical care based on residents' documented preferences. The resident had specifically chosen aggressive intervention, trusting that facility staff would honor those wishes during medical crises.

Nursing facilities must maintain robust systems ensuring all direct care staff understand emergency procedures and possess current certifications. Regular drills and competency assessments help identify knowledge gaps before they impact resident outcomes during actual emergencies.

The immediate jeopardy citation reflects the severity of placing multiple residents at risk through inadequate emergency response capabilities, demonstrating how individual incidents can reveal broader systematic problems requiring comprehensive corrective action.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Roo-lan Healthcare Center from 2025-03-12 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, through Twin Digital Media's regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: March 22, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

Crystal Cove Post Acute in LACEY, WA was cited for violations during a health inspection on March 12, 2025.

## Critical Communication Failures Investigation revealed concerning gaps in staff knowledge regarding the resident's care preferences.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Crystal Cove Post Acute?
## Critical Communication Failures Investigation revealed concerning gaps in staff knowledge regarding the resident's care preferences.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in LACEY, WA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Crystal Cove Post Acute or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 505254.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Crystal Cove Post Acute's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.
Advertisement