The March incident at Stanley Healthcare Center illustrates broader infection control breakdowns that federal inspectors documented during a three-day survey. Staff repeatedly ignored safety protocols designed to prevent the spread of dangerous infections, used contaminated equipment on multiple residents, and failed to accurately track infections in their surveillance systems.

The violations put residents at risk of acquiring multidrug-resistant organisms and other serious infections, according to the inspection report completed March 6.
Protective Gear Ignored
CNA 3 admitted she knew she needed to wear a gown when caring for Resident 7, who required enhanced barrier precautions due to an indwelling urinary catheter. But on two separate occasions in early March, inspectors observed her providing direct care without the required protective equipment.
On March 3, she handed the resident a wet towel to wipe his face while wearing no gown. The next day, inspectors watched her touch and reposition the resident and pick up his urinary catheter bag, again without a gown.
"I knew I needed to wear a gown but forgot to because I was rushing to assist the resident," CNA 3 told inspectors when confronted about the violations.
Enhanced barrier precautions require staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact activities like dressing, bathing, transferring residents, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, assisting with toileting, device care, and wound treatment. The precautions are designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes, particularly for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices.
A hospice nurse made a similar error while treating Resident 20, who had bilateral lower extremity open wounds. On March 3, inspectors observed the licensed nurse providing wound care while wearing gloves but no gown, despite a sign posted outside the resident's door indicating enhanced barrier precautions were required.
"I missed the sign and should have worn a gown to prevent cross contamination," the hospice nurse told inspectors.
Contaminated Equipment Used on Multiple Residents
Staff used blood pressure cuffs with cloth and Velcro surfaces that couldn't be properly disinfected, then moved the contaminated equipment from resident to resident.
On March 4, inspectors watched LVN 1 take Resident 8's blood pressure using a wrist cuff with Velcro and cloth material. After getting the reading, she wiped the cuff with Micro-Kill germicidal wipes before using it on the next resident.
Later that morning, LVN 2 used the same type of contaminated cuff on Resident 3, then attempted to disinfect it with the same wipes.
The problem: Micro-Kill wipes are only designed for hard, non-porous surfaces like stainless steel, plastic, and glass. The manufacturer's guidelines specifically state the wipes should not be used on porous materials like cloth and Velcro.
"The Micro-Kill wipes was only for non-porous surfaces and it was inappropriate to use on the porous material of the wrist BP cuff," LVN 2 acknowledged to inspectors.
LVN 1 admitted the facility had electronic blood pressure machines, manual cuffs, and stethoscopes with cleanable surfaces available for staff use. She acknowledged that equipment with non-cleanable materials posed an infection control risk.
Infection Tracking Failures
The facility's infection surveillance system contained multiple inaccuracies that prevented proper monitoring of antibiotic use and infection trends.
Resident 627 was readmitted in February with a clostridium difficile infection, a potentially deadly condition that requires contact isolation precautions. But the Director of Staff Development and Infection Preventionist failed to include the infection in the February 2025 surveillance log.
The resident had 10 episodes of loose stools or diarrhea in February and five more episodes in March, yet staff were "inaccurately documenting" her bowel movements, the infection preventionist admitted. No contact isolation signage was posted outside her room.
The surveillance failures extended beyond tracking. For five residents with infections in January and February 2025, physicians were never notified when the infections didn't meet McGeer criteria, the standard used to determine appropriate antibiotic treatment in long-term care facilities.
Residents 2, 6, 9, 18, and 22 all had documented infections that failed to meet the clinical criteria, but their doctors were left uninformed. The monthly surveillance reports didn't track how many residents had infections that didn't warrant antibiotic treatment, making it impossible to monitor for overuse of antibiotics.
Equipment Falsification
Staff falsified quality control records for blood glucose monitoring equipment, creating the potential for inaccurate readings when checking residents' blood sugar levels.
The quality control log for a glucometer with serial number 1040-4333929 showed staff had completed required testing throughout February and March 2025. But when inspectors compared the documented results to the device's internal memory, they found the records were fabricated.
Results allegedly recorded on February 1 through 4, February 6, February 8 through 13, February 16 through 20, February 23 through 27, and March 3 didn't exist in the glucometer's saved data. For example, the log showed normal and high control results of 96 mg/dl and 256 mg/dl on February 1, but those readings weren't found anywhere in the device's memory.
LVN 1 verified the discrepancies when shown the evidence. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the falsified records when informed of the findings.
Bed Safety Assessment Errors
The facility failed to accurately assess four residents for potential bed entrapment, a serious safety hazard that has resulted in deaths and injuries among elderly nursing home residents.
Residents 1, 12, 13, and 20 all had inaccurate entrapment assessments, according to inspectors who reviewed the facility's bed inspection measurements from January 6. The measurements for bed frame lengths, mattress lengths, mattress heights, and safety zone assessments contained errors that could have masked entrapment risks.
Resident 13, who has Alzheimer's disease and uses bilateral half side rails for turning and repositioning, was among those with an inaccurate assessment. The resident was observed sleeping with both side rails elevated during the inspection.
Entrapment occurs when residents become caught, trapped, or entangled in spaces around bed rails, mattresses, or bed frames. The most vulnerable residents are elderly patients who are frail, confused, restless, or have uncontrolled body movements.
The facility's own policy requires assessments to determine residents' risk of entrapment and ensure bed dimensions are appropriate for each resident's size and weight. The inaccurate assessments violated those requirements and potentially left residents exposed to serious injury or death.
Stanley Healthcare Center's infection control program is overseen by the Director of Staff Development, who also serves as the facility's infection preventionist. The violations documented during the March inspection indicate systemic failures in training, oversight, and compliance with basic safety protocols designed to protect some of California's most vulnerable residents.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Stanley Healthcare Center from 2025-03-06 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.