Skip to main content
Advertisement

Woodland Manor: Staff Work 20+ Hours Straight - IN

Healthcare Facility:

QMA 3 and LPN 6 were still observed working on the floor at 3:35 p.m. on February 28, more than 20 hours after their shifts began at 6:30 p.m. the previous evening. QMA 3 told inspectors at 12:18 p.m. that she was staying over to cover a call-off for day shift and "there had been no communication about a replacement from anyone."

Woodland Manor facility inspection

She wasn't offered a bonus for the extended shift.

Advertisement

The staffing crisis left just two certified nursing assistants to care for 39 residents on Units 1 and 2 during the day shift — a ratio of one aide to nearly 20 residents. The facility's own assessment from December 2024 called for a ratio of one aide to six residents.

CNA 12 explained the consequences during an interview: "If there are three aides on Unit 1 and 2, then the showers could get done. If there were just two aides, then not all of them (showers) were completed." Staff were "too busy getting residents up, assisting with meals, and laying the residents down" to complete the 10 scheduled showers.

CNA 11 confirmed the pattern was routine. With three aides assigned, showers were provided, "but any less than three aides, the assigned work could not be completed and this occurred all the time."

The Quality Assurance Director acknowledged the facility "usually did not have a lot of staff call-offs" but explained that the Director of Nursing, Administrator, and scheduler had all been out sick. The scheduler had just returned to work that day and was "working to have staff come in to cover."

If replacements couldn't be found for staff who had already worked more than 16 hours, the corporate nurse would have to work a medication cart, the QAD said. Inspectors never observed the corporate nurse working any unit.

Meanwhile, staff who were present ignored basic infection control procedures. At 5:20 a.m. on February 28, inspectors watched CNA 7 and QMA 8 provide personal care for Resident M, who had an indwelling urinary catheter and was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.

Both staff members entered the room and put on gloves but didn't wear gowns. A sign on the wall next to the door clearly indicated the resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.

QMA 8 told inspectors that "staff never wore gowns for Resident M and she did not know the resident was on EBP even though he had a urinary catheter and a sign was present in the hall." CNA 7 also said she didn't know the resident was on isolation precautions.

Resident M's physician orders from December 3, 2024, specifically required gown and gloves for dressing, bathing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, assisting with toileting, and any device care involving his urinary catheter.

His care plan, initiated in July 2024, repeated the requirement that staff wear gowns and gloves for personal hygiene, changing briefs, or providing care for the urinary catheter.

The Director of Quality Assurance acknowledged that "staff should have known the resident was on EBP and should have been wearing gowns." Records showed CNA 7 had received education on Enhanced Barrier Precautions on February 11, 2025, and QMA 8 had attended training that included EBP education on December 19, 2024.

The facility's own assessment, completed in December 2024, painted a picture of comprehensive care capabilities. It listed 58 residents requiring assistance with bathing, 35 needing help with dressing and toileting, and 35 with behavior symptoms requiring specialized attention.

The assessment claimed staffing was "adequate as evidence by: All care requirements are met daily and by shift."

But inspectors found the opposite. Resident H didn't have her call light answered in a timely manner. Scheduled showers went uncompleted when staffing dropped below three aides. Staff worked marathon shifts exceeding 20 hours while basic infection control protocols were ignored despite clear signage and recent training.

The facility offered bonuses to staff who picked up extra shifts, but QMA 3 wasn't offered one despite working through the night and well into the next afternoon.

The inspection was conducted in response to two complaints filed with state regulators about conditions at the 343 S Nappanee Street facility.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Woodland Manor from 2025-02-28 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 19, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

WOODLAND MANOR in ELKHART, IN was cited for violations during a health inspection on February 28, 2025.

QMA 3 and LPN 6 were still observed working on the floor at 3:35 p.m.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at WOODLAND MANOR?
QMA 3 and LPN 6 were still observed working on the floor at 3:35 p.m.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in ELKHART, IN, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from WOODLAND MANOR or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 155086.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check WOODLAND MANOR's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.