Skip to main content
Advertisement

Seacrest Post-Acute: Medication Errors Hit 11.5% - CA

The incident at Seacrest Post-Acute Care Center exemplified systematic medication failures that pushed the facility's error rate to 11.54 percent — more than double the federal threshold of 5 percent. Federal inspectors documented the violations during a February 28 inspection of the 62-bed facility on West 6th Street.

Seacrest Post-acute Care  Center facility inspection

Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 discovered the problem during a routine blood glucose check for Resident 54, whose sugar level measured 230 mg/dL. The nurse retrieved a Humalog insulin pen and adjusted it to seven units, but when inspectors asked about the pen's expiration date, she realized it had no "open date" label.

Advertisement

"She did not see an opened date on the pen and would not know its expiration date," inspectors wrote. The nurse had to abandon the dose and search the medication refrigerator for a fresh pen.

According to manufacturer guidelines, insulin pens must be used within 28 days of opening or be discarded. The facility's Director of Nursing acknowledged that unlabeled insulin "increased the risk of glycemic reactions such as hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia" if expired medication was administered.

The medication errors extended beyond improper labeling. During morning medication rounds, Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 failed to instruct Resident 37 to chew an aspirin tablet specifically prescribed as "chewable." The resident swallowed the 81-milligram tablet along with four other medications.

"The absorption of chewable aspirin would be affected and might not provide benefit to prevent stroke for Resident 37 if it was not taken as specified by manufacturer," the nurse told inspectors afterward.

The third violation involved a two-hour delay in administering Vitamin D3 to Resident 367. The nurse prepared medications at 9:15 a.m. but discovered he lacked the prescribed capsule formulation. Rather than immediately clarifying the order with the physician, he waited until 11:00 a.m. to give the medication — well beyond the facility's 60-minute window for timely administration.

The medication problems coincided with dangerous storage conditions in both facility refrigerators. Inspectors found temperatures running at 50 degrees Fahrenheit in refrigeration units that should maintain 36 to 46 degrees.

The warm temperatures compromised dozens of medications, including 17 insulin pens, emergency antibiotics, flu vaccines, and eye drops. At Station 1, inspectors documented lorazepam for anxiety, Humulin insulin, Humalog, and promethazine suppositories all stored above safe temperatures.

"The medications would not be safe or effective to administer to facility residents," Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 acknowledged when confronted with the 50-degree reading.

Station 2's refrigerator contained similar problems: 10 Humalog pens, 12 Lantus insulin pens, blood pressure medications, and various other drugs stored at temperatures that could render them ineffective or toxic.

The Director of Nursing confirmed she had ordered replacement refrigerators, admitting that improperly stored medications "would increase risk for residents' harm, and adverse events such as hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, infection, and hospitalization."

Kitchen operations revealed equally troubling safety lapses. Dietary Aide 1, responsible for sanitizing dishes that serve 60 residents, couldn't identify the correct test strips for measuring chlorine sanitizer concentration in the dish machine.

When asked to check sanitizer levels, she reached for QUAT test strips instead of the required chlorine strips. Another staff member had to intervene, explaining that the aide was "new and forget which test strip to use."

The aide later admitted she didn't know the normal concentration range for dish machine sanitizer, which should read 50-100 parts per million. Without proper sanitization, dishes could harbor bacteria and spread foodborne illness throughout the facility.

Food safety violations multiplied during the kitchen inspection. Inspectors found 25 vanilla and 25 chocolate pudding cups dated five days earlier — exceeding the three-day storage limit for prepared desserts. Twenty single-serve nutritional supplement cartons sat in the refrigerator despite being on a manufacturer's voluntary recall list for potential listeria contamination.

Twenty-three containers of expired milk and two packages of turkey deli meat that had been thawed and refrozen occupied valuable refrigerator space. Most concerning, the facility served fried eggs made from unpasteurized shell eggs, violating federal requirements that nursing homes use only pasteurized eggs.

"The vendor did not have pasteurized eggs because of the egg shortage," the Dietary Supervisor explained, though the cook preparing breakfast was unaware the eggs weren't pasteurized.

The sanitizer problems extended beyond dish washing. When Cook 1 tested the cleaning solution used on food preparation surfaces, test strips showed the sanitizer was completely ineffective. A second test yielded the same result.

"When there was no sanitizer then the counters were not being sanitized and it can cross contaminate the food, making residents sick," Cook 2 admitted.

Infection control failures appeared in patient care areas as well. During wound treatment for Resident 33, who had a partial foot amputation and bone infection, inspectors observed the treatment nurse failing to wash her hands between glove changes four times.

The nurse later acknowledged her error: "She should have performed hand hygiene in between glove changes to remove the germs. There was a possibility to spread infection when not washing her hands in between glove changes."

Additional violations included overcrowded rooms housing five residents instead of the maximum four, inadequate square footage in eight resident rooms, and failure to provide required dementia care training for nursing assistants.

The Infection Preventionist admitted missing antibiotic monitoring for Resident 39, who received Keflex for a urinary tract infection without proper surveillance documentation. "If he had completed the Surveillance Data Collection form, he would have found that Resident 39 did not meet the criteria to start antibiotic for a urinary tract infection," inspectors noted.

Two nursing assistants told inspectors they had never received dementia training despite caring for residents with cognitive impairment. The Director of Staff Development confirmed she hadn't provided the January dementia training listed on the facility calendar, leaving new staff without required education.

"Without the CNAs receiving the proper training that was required could potentially lead to physical and mental harm to the residents," she acknowledged.

The cascade of violations — from expired insulin to contaminated food surfaces to missing infection control — painted a picture of systematic oversight failures at the 1416 West 6th Street facility. Resident 54 ultimately received his insulin dose, but only after a 35-minute delay that could have triggered dangerous blood sugar swings in a diabetic patient already struggling with foot ulcers and nerve damage.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Seacrest Post-acute Care Center from 2025-02-28 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 19, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

SEACREST POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER in SAN PEDRO, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on February 28, 2025.

Federal inspectors documented the violations during a February 28 inspection of the 62-bed facility on West 6th Street.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at SEACREST POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER?
Federal inspectors documented the violations during a February 28 inspection of the 62-bed facility on West 6th Street.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SAN PEDRO, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from SEACREST POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 055070.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check SEACREST POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.