Skip to main content
Advertisement

Rehabilitation Center on Pico: Medication Errors - CA

The scene at The Rehabilitation Center on Pico revealed a medication crisis that federal inspectors called immediate jeopardy. Eleven residents received critical drugs hours late, putting them at risk of strokes, heart attacks, liver damage, and uncontrolled bleeding.

The Rehabilitation Center On Pico facility inspection

Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 told inspectors on February 25 she still had 17 residents waiting for their 9 a.m. medications when she finally reached Resident 50 at 10:27 a.m. The patient, who suffered from stroke-related paralysis on her left side, atrial fibrillation, and depression, was supposed to receive seven medications nearly an hour and a half earlier.

Advertisement

Among those delayed drugs was Eliquis, a blood thinner that prevents clots in patients with irregular heartbeats. The medication carries a black box warning — the FDA's most serious alert — about bleeding risks that can be fatal.

Resident 50 refused two of the seven medications when the nurse finally arrived. She declined the stool softener and calcium supplement but accepted the rest, including the critical blood thinner, blood pressure medication, and aspirin for heart attack prevention.

The nurse wasn't alone in running behind schedule.

On the same morning, Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 told inspectors at 10:11 a.m. he still had 12 residents waiting for medications scheduled for 9 a.m. Out of 27 total residents under his care, he typically finished morning medication rounds around 11:30 a.m. — two and a half hours after the scheduled time.

"It can be overwhelming especially when you tried to give the best care, not rush residents, and not make mistakes," he told inspectors.

The facility's policy required medications to be given within one hour of their scheduled time. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that physicians should be contacted before administering medications outside that window. But no doctors were called before the late doses were given to residents on February 25.

Federal inspectors discovered the medication timing failures affected residents taking some of the most dangerous drugs in the facility's arsenal.

Five residents — including Resident 50 — received late doses of Eliquis, the blood thinner that requires precise timing to maintain therapeutic levels. When blood thinner doses are delayed, patients face increased risks of stroke from clots or life-threatening bleeding from accumulation.

Two residents missed scheduled doses of seizure medications. Resident 1 was supposed to receive Depakote at 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. but got doses that were 39 minutes to nearly two hours late on four separate days in February. Resident 37 missed properly timed doses of Keppra, another anti-seizure drug, on five days.

Missing or delayed seizure medications can trigger breakthrough seizures and liver toxicity from irregular dosing patterns.

Four residents with diabetes received insulin and other blood sugar medications outside the prescribed schedule, creating risks for dangerously high or low glucose levels.

The medication cart system had broken down under the patient load. Nurse 3 explained that four of her 32 residents required medications through feeding tubes directly into their stomachs, a process that takes additional time. She had notified supervisors and the Director of Nursing about the overwhelming workload, but the facility hadn't adjusted staffing or schedules.

During the inspection, inspectors watched as nurses struggled with assignments that made timely medication administration impossible. The facility operated with three medication carts for dozens of residents requiring multiple daily medications.

Resident 50's case illustrated the cascade of medical complexity that made timing critical. Her care plan specifically noted the black box warning for Eliquis and stated the goal was preventing side effects and drug interactions. Another care plan entry warned about her risk for repeat stroke and emphasized giving medications as ordered to minimize that risk.

The stroke patient required substantial help with personal hygiene, was dependent on staff for bathing, dressing, and getting in and out of bed. Her cognitive skills for daily decision-making were moderately impaired, though her medical history indicated she retained capacity to understand and make medical decisions.

Her medication regimen included seven different drugs: the blood thinner for atrial fibrillation, blood pressure medication, an antidepressant for verbalized sadness, aspirin for heart attack prevention, a stool softener, calcium with vitamin D, and as-needed Tylenol for pain.

Each medication served a specific purpose in managing her multiple conditions following her stroke. The blood pressure medication was held if her systolic pressure dropped below 110. The stool softener was held for loose bowel movements. The Tylenol carried a warning not to exceed three grams in 24 hours from all sources.

On February 26, federal inspectors declared immediate jeopardy — their most serious finding — after determining that 11 residents faced serious injury, harm, or death from the medication errors.

The facility's removal plan included immediate changes. Licensed nurses completed assessments on all affected residents and reported the medication errors. The Director of Nursing contacted a pharmacy consultant and requested an additional medication cart, which was delivered the same day.

Staff redistributed resident assignments across four medication carts instead of three. All licensed nurses received re-education on medication administration policies before their next shifts. The facility implemented shift-by-shift monitoring for adverse reactions in affected residents.

Medical records staff generated an audit of all medication administration times to identify any additional residents affected by timing errors.

But for Resident 50 and the ten other residents who received critical medications hours late, the damage was already done. Their blood thinner levels had fluctuated. Their seizure medications had gaps. Their blood pressure and blood sugar medications missed their therapeutic windows.

The immediate jeopardy was removed on February 27 after inspectors verified the facility's corrective actions. Yet the case revealed how staffing shortages and inadequate systems had put residents at risk of stroke, bleeding, seizures, and other life-threatening complications from something as basic as getting medications on time.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for The Rehabilitation Center On Pico from 2025-02-27 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 20, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO in LOS ANGELES, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on February 27, 2025.

The scene at The Rehabilitation Center on Pico revealed a medication crisis that federal inspectors called immediate jeopardy.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO?
The scene at The Rehabilitation Center on Pico revealed a medication crisis that federal inspectors called immediate jeopardy.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in LOS ANGELES, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 056377.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.