Skip to main content
Advertisement

Pico Rehab: Critical Medication Safety Failures - CA

The dangerous medication timing errors at The Rehabilitation Center on Pico created what federal inspectors called "immediate jeopardy" conditions for residents dependent on precisely timed drugs to prevent strokes, seizures, and other life-threatening complications.

The Rehabilitation Center On Pico facility inspection

During a February inspection, investigators found nurses routinely administering medications hours past their scheduled times across multiple shifts. One Licensed Vocational Nurse told inspectors she had 17 more residents to medicate that morning, all scheduled for 9 a.m. doses, and "was not able to pass medications to all of residents on time."

Advertisement

The facility's Director of Nursing acknowledged that physicians must be notified when medications fall outside the one-hour window before or after scheduled administration times. But inspectors found no documentation that doctors were called before nurses gave late medications to 23 residents between February 17-25.

Resident 50, who suffered a stroke affecting her left side, was prescribed Apixaban 5 mg twice daily at 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. for atrial fibrillation. The blood thinner carries a black box warning about bleeding risks and requires consistent timing to maintain therapeutic levels.

On February 2, her morning dose came at 3:09 p.m., six hours and nine minutes late. That evening's dose was then administered at 8:33 p.m., creating a dangerous five-hour gap instead of the ordered 12-hour interval between doses.

The pattern continued throughout February. On February 9, her morning medication arrived at 1:55 p.m., nearly five hours late. The evening dose followed at 8:17 p.m., just six hours and 22 minutes after the previous dose.

"I usually get my medications late, but I knew the nurses were very busy," Resident 50 told inspectors during the medication pass observation.

The timing failures extended beyond blood thinners to seizure medications requiring precise dosing schedules. Resident 1, prescribed Depakote for seizure control, received morning doses consistently late throughout the inspection period.

On February 20, his 9 a.m. Depakote dose was given at 1:37 p.m., four hours and 37 minutes late. The 1 p.m. dose followed just 39 minutes later at 2:16 p.m. The Director of Nursing called this "double dosing" that could cause "toxic levels" and potentially trigger seizures or hospitalization.

Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 described the overwhelming workload during an interview. With 27 residents assigned to his medication cart, he typically finished morning medications around 11:30 a.m. "It can be overwhelming, especially when you are trying to give the best care, not rush residents, and not make mistakes," he said.

The facility's pharmacist consultant had warned administrators months earlier about the dangerous medication delays. He suggested adding nursing staff to prevent late administrations and emphasized the importance of maintaining therapeutic drug levels, particularly for blood thinners.

"When medications were administered over three hours late, that was not acceptable practice," the pharmacist told inspectors. He explained that maintaining consistent timing was critical for drugs like Apixaban due to their pharmacokinetics.

Resident 10, also on blood thinners for atrial fibrillation, experienced similar dangerous gaps in medication timing. On February 24, his morning Eliquis dose came at 2:29 p.m., over five hours late. The evening dose was then administered at 5:17 p.m., just two hours and 48 minutes later instead of the required eight-hour interval.

Nursing notes documented that Resident 10 showed "discoloration to right wrist" during the inspection period, a potential sign of bleeding complications from the anticoagulant therapy.

The medication errors affected residents with multiple serious conditions. Resident 54, with a history of repeated falls and persistent atrial fibrillation, was on fall risk precautions while receiving anticoagulant therapy. Her medication administration records showed similar dangerous timing gaps throughout February.

Seizure medication delays created additional risks. Resident 37, prescribed Keppra twice daily for seizure control, received doses up to five hours late. On February 20, his morning dose came at 2:12 p.m., with the evening dose following at 5:47 p.m., creating only a three-hour gap instead of the required eight hours.

The facility's policy required medications to be administered within 60 minutes of scheduled times. Yet inspection records showed systematic violations across multiple nursing stations and shifts.

One Licensed Vocational Nurse managed 32 residents, including four requiring gastrostomy tube feedings that significantly increased administration time. She reported the heavy workload to supervisors but continued working alone during critical morning medication passes.

The Director of Nursing provided inspectors with a list of 23 residents who received late medications between February 17-25. Eleven residents were assigned to one medication cart, 12 to another, with both nurses consistently missing the facility's own timing requirements.

Beyond individual patient risks, the medication errors revealed systemic staffing and workflow problems. Nurses described feeling rushed while trying to provide careful medication administration to cognitively impaired residents requiring assistance.

The facility's care plans acknowledged the risks. Resident 50's plan specifically warned about black box warnings for her blood thinner and included goals to prevent side effects and interactions. Similar plans existed for other residents receiving high-risk medications.

During the inspection, nurses continued the dangerous practices inspectors were documenting. On February 25, investigators observed morning medications being prepared at 10:17 a.m. for residents scheduled to receive them at 9 a.m.

The pharmacist consultant's earlier warnings proved prescient. His recommendations for additional nursing support to prevent dangerous medication delays had gone unheeded, leaving residents vulnerable to the precise complications he had warned about months before the federal inspection.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for The Rehabilitation Center On Pico from 2025-02-27 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 20, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO in LOS ANGELES, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on February 27, 2025.

During a February inspection, investigators found nurses routinely administering medications hours past their scheduled times across multiple shifts.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO?
During a February inspection, investigators found nurses routinely administering medications hours past their scheduled times across multiple shifts.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in LOS ANGELES, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 056377.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check THE REHABILITATION CENTER ON PICO's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.