Sancta Maria Nursing: Skin Checks Missed 10 Months - MA
The last completed skin check in the resident's medical record was dated April 29, 2024. Inspectors arrived on February 25, 2025. Nobody had done one since.
Advertisement
Losing sleep over a loved one's care?
The Derila Ergo memory foam pillow supports your neck in any sleep position. 60-day return policy.
See the Derila PillowSkin assessments matter in nursing homes because residents who spend long hours in bed or in wheelchairs are at constant risk of pressure injuries. The bony prominences, as nurses call them, the heels, hips, tailbone, shoulder blades, are the first places tissue breaks down when circulation is cut off by sustained pressure. Weekly checks exist to catch problems before they become wounds. Wounds, once open, can become infected. Infections in elderly patients can turn fatal.
Nurse #4 explained the process to inspectors during an interview at 9:50 in the morning on February 25. Skin checks should happen weekly, she said, and the nurse completing them should document the results under the assessment tab in the medical record. It was not a complicated procedure. It was not an obscure policy. It was something every nurse at the facility was expected to know.
The Director of Nurses said the same thing forty minutes later. Weekly skin assessments go under the assessment tab, or a nurse writes a progress note confirming a full body skin check was completed. Either way, there should be a record.
There was no record.
That afternoon, the Assistant Director of Nursing pulled up Resident #48's chart and went looking. She found nothing since April 2024. She was direct about what that meant: even if a skin check was marked as implemented somewhere on the treatment administration record, it did not count as completed unless the assessment itself appeared under the assessment tab. A checkbox somewhere else in the system was not a skin check. It was a notation that a skin check was supposed to happen.
The Director of Nurses came back to inspectors at 2:17 that afternoon. She confirmed what the ADON had found. She said the resident should have had a weekly skin check throughout the period in question. She could not locate one anywhere in the record going back to April 2024.
Then she offered an explanation. There had been a change in their medical record system, she said. The resident was missed because of it.
A software transition is a plausible source of confusion. Workflows change, tabs move, staff retrain on new interfaces. What it does not explain is ten months without anyone noticing. The Director of Nurses oversees nursing care across the facility. The ADON reviews records. Nurses document daily. Somewhere in that chain, across roughly forty weeks of required assessments, no one flagged that this resident's skin check column had gone dark.
The violation was cited at a level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, the lower end of the federal deficiency scale. That classification reflects what inspectors could document, not necessarily what occurred. A skin assessment that was never recorded is also an assessment that cannot be reviewed. If something changed with this resident's skin between April 2024 and February 2025, there is no weekly record to show when it started, how it progressed, or whether anyone noticed.
Sancta Maria Nursing Facility sits on Concord Avenue in Cambridge and is certified under Medicare and Medicaid. The inspection was completed February 26, 2025.
What the record shows is a gap. Ten months of weekly assessments that were either not done, not documented, or lost in a system migration that nobody caught until a federal inspector asked to see the chart.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Sancta Maria Nursing Facility from 2025-02-26 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Corrections: We strive for accuracy in everything we publish. If you believe any fact in this article is incorrect, please contact us with details, and we will review and correct it promptly.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: November 14, 2026 · Our methodology
Sancta Maria Nursing Facility in CAMBRIDGE, MA was cited for violations during a health inspection on February 26, 2025.
The last completed skin check in the resident's medical record was dated April 29, 2024.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.