Skip to main content
Advertisement

View Heights Conv Hosp: Expired Medication Violations - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The violations at View Heights Conv Hosp on South Avalon Boulevard emerged during a February inspection that revealed systematic failures in medication management, dietary services, and basic resident care.

View Heights Conv Hosp facility inspection

Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 gave Resident 56 expired Ozempic injections throughout January and early February. The injection pen had been opened November 5, 2024, and should have been discarded December 31, 2024, according to manufacturer instructions. Instead, the nurse continued using it until February 11, 2025.

Advertisement

"The medication could have lost its potency," the Director of Nursing told inspectors. She said using Ozempic beyond its expiration date could prevent Resident 56 from achieving the desired weight loss the medication was prescribed for.

The same nurse documented administering Resident 56's February 11 Ozempic dose on the medication record, but actually gave the injection the following day. When confronted, LVN 1 admitted she "forgot to administer the dose after Resident 56 changed her mind" about taking it.

"Medications should not be documented as administered before they are given," the Director of Nursing stated.

Meanwhile, another diabetic resident received insulin injections for five consecutive days without required blood glucose monitoring. Resident 31's insulin order had been reduced from 24 units to 12 units on February 8, but the medication administration record failed to prompt nurses to check blood sugar levels before giving the injections.

LVN 1 told inspectors she was "confused why Resident 31's order did not include blood glucose monitoring" and should have clarified the order with the physician before administering any insulin. Without blood glucose checks, she said, residents could experience dangerous hypoglycemic symptoms including shakiness, dizziness, and confusion.

The medication problems extended beyond diabetes care. Resident 16, who had four staples in his scalp from a head injury, never received ordered daily wound cleaning. Two days after his readmission, dried blood remained visible around the staples.

"Since his fall no staff had cleansed his scalp," Resident 16 told inspectors. The physician's order to cleanse the wound with soap and water daily was never transcribed to the medication administration record.

Dietary failures compounded the facility's problems. Kitchen staff served breakfast sandwiches without the required sausage meat to all 146 residents on February 13. The cook told inspectors she "did not have any sausage in the kitchen" and had notified the Dietary Supervisor, who served the incomplete meals anyway.

"She did not know the sandwich had to have meat," inspectors noted about the Dietary Supervisor. The facility's own recipe specified the breakfast sandwich required one sausage patty along with egg and cheese.

The Dietary Supervisor lacked proper qualifications for the position. She was enrolled in food service classes but had not completed required education. The Director of Nursing acknowledged "the DS was not qualified to work as a DS because she was still in school."

The registered dietician was present only one day per week, leaving no qualified supervisor in the kitchen most days. The facility also lacked a system to ensure meal substitutes provided equal nutritional value when residents refused planned meals.

Residents faced additional barriers to adequate nutrition. The dining room contained only 40 chairs for 50 residents, forcing some to wait in line or return to their rooms until seats became available.

"The dining room did not have enough space for all residents to sit down and eat together," a nursing assistant explained. Staff routinely told residents to "go back to their room" and wait for available seating.

Three residents' food preferences and allergies were ignored. Resident 97 repeatedly requested cheese quesadillas instead of meals she found unappetizing, but staff offered only peanut butter sandwiches, grilled cheese, or salad as alternatives. Kitchen staff had ingredients to make quesadillas but the option wasn't included on substitute request forms.

Resident 81's shrimp allergy disappeared from his diet card, and staff served him black beans despite a physician's order specifying he didn't want beans and needed protein replacement. When residents requested snacks between scheduled times, nurses told them snacks weren't available "if it was not on paper."

Food safety violations pervaded the kitchen. Inspectors found expired spinach bags in the walk-in refrigerator, cheese without use-by dates, and unlabeled lettuce. The dry storage room lacked a required thermometer for temperature monitoring.

The facility's laundry operation also posed infection risks. Water temperature monitors on washing machines had been broken "for the past few days," preventing staff from ensuring proper disinfection. The maintenance supervisor said staff checked temperatures "by feeling how hot the outside of the washer viewing glasses was."

Dryer lint traps weren't cleaned as required, with no documentation of cleaning on the morning of inspection despite policy requiring removal twice per shift.

Administrative failures extended to resident contracts. The facility provided arbitration agreements only in English to a Spanish-speaking conservator who "spoke very little English and was unable to explain what arbitration was." The agreements also lacked required venue selection provisions.

A resident who fell in December never received a required interdisciplinary team conference to prevent future falls. The Director of Nursing confirmed no conference occurred despite facility policy calling for investigation and intervention after incidents.

Psychotropic medications were prescribed without proper monitoring. Resident 3 received Cymbalta for "self-isolative behavior" but staff never documented monitoring for the behavior the medication was supposed to treat. Monthly assessments showed she exhibited no depression for months, yet no gradual dose reduction was attempted.

The inspection revealed a facility struggling with basic care standards across multiple departments. From expired medications and inadequate nutrition to infection control failures and administrative oversights, the violations painted a picture of systemic neglect affecting the facility's 146 residents.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for View Heights Conv Hosp from 2025-02-14 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

VIEW HEIGHTS CONV HOSP in LOS ANGELES, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on February 14, 2025.

Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 gave Resident 56 expired Ozempic injections throughout January and early February.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at VIEW HEIGHTS CONV HOSP?
Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 gave Resident 56 expired Ozempic injections throughout January and early February.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in LOS ANGELES, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from VIEW HEIGHTS CONV HOSP or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 056417.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check VIEW HEIGHTS CONV HOSP's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.