The outbreak sent residents to emergency rooms with sepsis, respiratory failure, and oxygen levels dangerously low. One patient required intensive care for septic shock.

Federal inspectors found the facility's infection prevention staff couldn't track who had received flu vaccines and who hadn't. "All residents were more susceptible to catching the flu because the IPs did not know what residents were vaccinated and what residents were not vaccinated," Infection Preventionist 1 told investigators on January 14.
The cascade of hospitalizations began December 25 when a resident with heart disease and compromised immunity developed a 102.3-degree fever and oxygen levels of 83 percent. Emergency responders transported the patient to the hospital, where doctors diagnosed influenza A, pneumonia, and sepsis.
Two days later, another immunocompromised resident was found with increased fatigue and fever. By the next afternoon, the patient was vomiting and oxygen levels had dropped so low that staff applied supplemental oxygen through a nasal tube before sending them to the hospital. Tests confirmed influenza A.
A third resident, who had received a flu shot the previous year, was hospitalized December 30 with weakness and poor appetite. Hospital records show the patient tested positive for influenza A and developed pneumonia requiring IV antibiotics. The patient returned to the facility January 5 under droplet isolation precautions.
The most severe case occurred January 11. A resident with diabetes, heart failure, and compromised immunity complained of breathing difficulty. Oxygen levels measured 78 percent despite supplemental oxygen at two liters per minute. Staff increased the oxygen to four liters and called 911.
Hospital records show the patient arrived in septic shock with rapid, shallow breathing and dangerously low oxygen levels. Doctors admitted the patient to intensive care for IV antibiotics and breathing treatments. A pulmonologist noted the patient was "ill-appearing, frail" and in "moderate distress," requiring close monitoring for possible intubation.
This patient's responsible party had consented to flu vaccination on December 18, but the shot was never given. "Resident 7 should have been offered the flu vaccine upon admission on December 16," the infection preventionist admitted.
The facility's vaccination tracking had completely broken down. During interviews, staff acknowledged their line list documenting the flu outbreak was "incomplete with missing information" for all seven hospitalized residents. The infection prevention team "were not following the process and were not appropriately tracking residents' flu vaccine status because the facility was not organized."
Several residents who declined vaccines had severe cognitive impairments that raised questions about their capacity to make medical decisions. One resident with "severe impaired cognition" was recorded as verbally declining the vaccine, but the infection preventionist later told investigators it "was not safe to offer" the vaccine because the resident "could not understand the risks and benefits."
Another family member disputed the facility's records entirely. When investigators called the responsible party for a resident who supposedly declined vaccination, the person stated they "would not decline the flu vaccine" for their loved one.
The Director of Nursing told investigators that admitting nurses were supposed to offer flu vaccines to new residents, while infection preventionists should screen all residents in August before flu season begins October 1. "It was important to screen residents to protect them from the flu and prevent the development of an infection," the director said.
But the system failed completely. "When there was no tracking system or log in place, residents who were medically eligible to receive the flu vaccine would not be offered the vaccine because of the facility's disorganization," the director acknowledged.
The facility's own policy required annual flu shots for all residents unless medically contraindicated, with proper documentation of education about risks and benefits. The policy emphasized that residents with conditions like heart disease, diabetes, or weakened immune systems face greater risk of flu complications.
Federal health officials classified the violations as immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. Six of the seven hospitalized residents had compromised immune systems, diabetes, or heart conditions that made them particularly vulnerable to influenza complications.
The outbreak occurred despite CDC guidance that flu vaccines prevent millions of illnesses and doctor visits each year, particularly among high-risk populations like nursing home residents.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Park Avenue Healthcare & Wellness Center from 2025-01-16 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Park Avenue Healthcare & Wellness Center
- Browse all CA nursing home inspections