Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Luzerne failed to conduct a comprehensive facility-wide assessment despite federal requirements that such evaluations drive staffing decisions and identify what skills staff need to care for residents, according to a January 16 inspection report.
The facility's assessment, last reviewed November 29, 2024, stated only that the nursing home has 37 beds and an average daily census of 36 residents. Nothing else. No information about the facility's population, no evaluation of resident conditions, no analysis of resources needed for day-to-day operations or emergencies.
Federal guidance requires nursing homes to assess diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of their resident population, the severity of residents' illnesses, and any other information that might affect services the facility must provide. The assessment should inform facilities about what skills and competencies staff must possess.
Kadima's assessment failed on all counts.
The facility's resident matrix from January 14 revealed 35 residents, including one receiving enteral feeding through a tube inserted into the stomach or small intestine. That resident required services from a qualified dietitian.
But the facility's food service director, interviewed January 14 at 9:30 AM, confirmed she was a Certified Dietary Manager who does not meet minimum qualifications to be a qualified dietitian or clinically qualified nutrition professional.
The facility does employ a part-time registered dietitian. She works remotely.
"She interacts with the registered dietitian via e-mail and telephone to provide/receive updates on residents," the food service director explained. The director visits residents to obtain food preferences, which are added to meal tickets and documented in clinical records. She attends care planning meetings.
Remote work presented complications. The nursing home administrator confirmed during a November 20 interview that the part-time registered dietitian, who also works for sister facilities, "completes nutritional assessments and nutritional progress notes offsite, without face-to-face interaction with the residents."
The administrator's November interview occurred nearly two months before the January inspection. By January 16, when inspectors pressed him about the deficient assessment, he acknowledged the obvious: "the Facility Assessment did not contain all the required information."
Federal regulators issued revised guidance in June 2024 emphasizing that facility assessments must drive staffing decisions. The guidance, contained in Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandum QSO-24-13-NH, specified that assessments should inform facilities about necessary staff skills and competencies.
Kadima's assessment contained none of this analysis.
The facility failed to assess the acuity level of its resident population. It failed to evaluate physical or cognitive limitations. It failed to identify specific resources necessary to meet resident needs during regular operations.
It failed to plan for emergencies.
The inspection report noted that this "deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect the quality of care and quality of life for all residents." With 35 residents in a 37-bed facility operating at near capacity, the stakes of inadequate assessment are significant.
The facility's approach to dietary services illustrates the broader problem. One resident required specialized nutritional support through enteral feeding. Federal regulations require qualified dietitians to oversee such complex nutritional needs. Yet the facility's on-site food service director lacked those qualifications, and the qualified dietitian worked remotely without face-to-face resident contact.
This arrangement might work. Or it might not. The facility's assessment provided no analysis either way.
The missing assessment components extend beyond dietary services. Federal guidance requires facilities to evaluate their entire resident population's needs and match them against available resources. This includes analyzing diseases and conditions throughout the facility, assessing cognitive limitations, and determining what level of care intensity residents require.
None of this appeared in Kadima's assessment.
The November 29 review date suggests facility leadership examined the document recently. They found it adequate despite its glaring omissions. The administrator's January admission that the assessment "did not contain all the required information" came only after federal inspectors identified the deficiencies.
Facilities use assessments to make critical decisions about staffing levels, skill requirements, and resource allocation. Without comprehensive evaluation of resident needs, administrators cannot determine whether they have sufficient qualified staff available during all shifts.
They cannot plan for emergencies.
They cannot ensure staff possess necessary competencies to deliver required care.
The inspection classified this violation as having "minimal harm or potential for actual harm" affecting "many" residents. While no immediate injuries resulted from the deficient assessment, the potential consequences extend to every person in the facility.
Inadequate assessment creates cascading risks. Understaffing during critical periods. Staff lacking necessary skills for complex medical conditions. Insufficient resources during emergencies. Poor care planning based on incomplete information.
The facility's 36-resident average daily census represents 36 people whose care depends on accurate assessment of their needs and available resources. The administrator's admission that the assessment was incomplete suggests those evaluations were not happening.
Kadima operates in a small Pennsylvania community where nursing home beds are limited. Families depend on facilities to conduct thorough assessments that ensure appropriate care levels. The January inspection revealed that fundamental process was not occurring.
The remote dietitian arrangement, while not necessarily problematic, exemplified the facility's assessment failures. Complex nutritional needs require careful evaluation and planning. Without comprehensive assessment, facilities cannot determine whether remote services adequately meet resident needs or whether on-site expertise is necessary.
Federal inspectors found a facility operating without the basic planning documents required to ensure resident safety and care quality. The administrator's acknowledgment came only after inspectors identified what should have been obvious deficiencies.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Luzerne from 2025-01-16 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Luzerne
- Browse all PA nursing home inspections
