NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA - A recent health inspection at Sherman Village HCC revealed multiple deficiencies in resident safety protocols, including improper use of physical restraints and failure to implement consultant pharmacist recommendations, putting vulnerable residents at increased risk of injury and suboptimal medication management.
Unauthorized Restraint Use Raises Safety Concerns
Inspectors documented three separate incidents where facility staff implemented physical restraints without proper authorization, assessments, or consent procedures. The violations involved residents with complex medical needs, including quadriplegia, epilepsy, and traumatic brain injuries—conditions that require careful balance between safety and personal freedom.
In one case, a resident with quadriplegia and seizure disorder was found with all four bed rails raised despite physician orders specifying only bilateral padded half rails for seizure precaution. When questioned, a certified nursing assistant acknowledged that placing all four side rails in the raised position constituted a restraint. Review of the resident's medical record revealed no physician's order, no consent from the resident's representative, no entrapment risk assessment, and no care plan addressing the use of all four rails.
The distinction matters significantly from a medical standpoint. Four-rail enclosure creates a complete barrier preventing independent egress from the bed, which legally and medically constitutes a physical restraint. Half rails, by contrast, can serve as positioning aids or supports while still allowing the resident to exit the bed independently. The presence of half rails versus full enclosure fundamentally changes the intervention from an assistive device to a movement restriction.
Improvised Restraint Methods Without Medical Assessment
A second resident with epilepsy presented an even more concerning situation. Staff had placed pillows underneath one side of the resident's mattress, creating an angled incline that tilted the resident toward the wall. The bed was positioned in a corner with one side against the wall and two quarter rails on the opposite side. This improvised positioning system effectively trapped the resident between the wall and the elevated mattress edge.
During interviews, staff members explained that the resident "attempts to jump out of the bed" and that the pillows helped "keep him in place." A family member confirmed that both she and facility staff regularly positioned the pillows this way. However, the resident's medical record contained no assessment of this practice, no physician's order, no consent documentation, and no evaluation of alternative interventions.
This type of improvised restraint poses multiple hazards. The angled positioning could interfere with proper body alignment, potentially causing pressure injuries or musculoskeletal problems. The combination of wall placement, elevated mattress edge, and bed rails creates entrapment zones where residents could become wedged. Additionally, without formal assessment, staff had no way to evaluate whether this intervention was medically appropriate or whether less restrictive alternatives might work.
The Minimum Data Set Coordinator acknowledged during the inspection that the pillows constituted a restraint and should not have been placed under the mattress without proper evaluation. Medical protocols require that any device or method restricting movement undergo systematic assessment including: identification of the specific medical need being addressed, evaluation of less restrictive alternatives, analysis of potential risks, and documentation of informed consent.
Unauthorized Four-Rail Use Despite Specific Orders
The third violation involved a resident with chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, and epilepsy. The physician had ordered bilateral upper half side rails specifically to prevent involuntary sliding when the head of the bed was elevated for tracheostomy management and tube feeding. The order included informed consent from the responsible party and an entrapment risk assessment—both documented for the specified half rails.
Despite these specific instructions, inspectors found the resident lying in bed with all four side rails raised. The registered nurse on duty confirmed that the physician's order was not being followed and acknowledged that using all four rails restricted the resident's movement. The Minimum Data Set Coordinator verified that both the consent and entrapment assessment had been obtained only for bilateral upper half rails, not for four-rail enclosure.
This violation demonstrates a critical gap between documented care plans and actual practice. When physician orders specify particular restraint configurations, those specifications typically reflect careful clinical judgment about balancing safety needs with mobility preservation. Upper half rails prevent sliding when the bed is elevated while leaving the lower bed accessible for independent movement. Full four-rail enclosure eliminates that mobility option entirely.
Medical Implications of Improper Restraint Use
The medical risks associated with unauthorized physical restraints are well-documented. Physical restraints increase the risk of serious injury or death from entrapment, strangulation, or asphyxiation. Residents may become caught between bed rails and the mattress, between split rails, or between the rail and the bed frame. The FDA has received reports of deaths and injuries from bed rail entrapment, particularly among elderly or cognitively impaired individuals.
Beyond entrapment hazards, inappropriate restraint use can cause psychological harm including increased agitation, anxiety, and sense of loss of dignity. Physical consequences may include pressure ulcers from immobility, reduced muscle strength and bone mass, incontinence, and constipation. Restraints can also create a false sense of security among staff, potentially leading to reduced monitoring and delayed recognition of problems.
Current medical standards emphasize individualized assessment before any restraint use. This assessment should document the specific medical symptom or condition necessitating the intervention, alternative approaches attempted or considered, potential risks specific to that resident, and how those risks will be monitored and mitigated. The assessment must consider factors such as the resident's cognitive status, physical condition, history of falls or injury, and ability to reposition independently.
Informed consent requirements exist because restraints involve significant trade-offs between safety and autonomy. Residents or their representatives need complete information about why the restraint is proposed, what alternatives were considered, what risks the restraint itself poses, and how the facility will monitor for complications. This allows for informed decision-making about whether the proposed intervention aligns with the resident's values and preferences.
Failure to Implement Medication Review Recommendations
Beyond the restraint violations, inspectors identified failure to carry out consultant pharmacist recommendations from the July 2024 medication regimen review for one resident. While specific details of the recommendation were not provided in the inspection report, this deficiency indicates a breakdown in the medication management oversight system.
Monthly medication regimen reviews by consultant pharmacists serve as a critical safety check in nursing facilities. These reviews evaluate whether current medication regimens remain appropriate, identify potential drug interactions or duplications, assess for medications that may no longer be necessary, and recommend adjustments to optimize therapeutic outcomes while minimizing adverse effects.
When consultant pharmacist recommendations are not implemented, residents may continue receiving medications that are no longer optimal for their condition. This could mean continued exposure to unnecessary side effects, missed opportunities to simplify complex medication regimens, or failure to address emerging drug-related problems. The breakdown suggests inadequate communication between the consultant pharmacist, medical providers, and nursing staff responsible for medication administration.
Additional Issues Identified
The inspection report referenced facility policies requiring specific procedures before bed rail use, including informing residents or representatives about benefits and hazards, obtaining informed consent, documenting assessed medical needs, identifying alternatives attempted and considered, and explaining how risks would be mitigated. The documented violations indicated systematic failure to follow these established protocols.
The facility's physical restraint policy outlined requirements for attempting less restrictive measures first, interdisciplinary team evaluation of all measures tried, obtaining physician orders specifying restraint type and purpose, and securing informed consent. The bed safety policy prohibited bed rail use unless specific criteria were met, including assessment, evaluation of alternatives, and consent procedures.
These policy documents demonstrated that the facility had appropriate protocols in place. The violations occurred not from lack of written procedures but from failure to implement those procedures consistently in actual practice. This implementation gap suggests potential issues with staff training, supervision, or accountability systems.
Sherman Village HCC now faces the challenge of addressing these systemic issues to ensure resident safety and rights are properly protected. The facility must demonstrate that restraints are used only when medically necessary, with proper authorization and oversight, and that all consultant pharmacist recommendations receive timely review and appropriate action.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Sherman Village Hcc from 2024-09-06 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
💬 Join the Discussion
Comments are moderated. Please keep discussions respectful and relevant to nursing home care quality.