Regency Center: Multiple Elopements, Poor Oversight - KY

Healthcare Facility:

LOUISVILLE, KY - Federal inspectors found that Regency Nursing and Rehabilitation Center failed to prevent three separate incidents where vulnerable residents with cognitive impairments left the facility unattended, including one who made it three houses away from the main road before being found.

Regency Center facility inspection

Security System Failures Enabled Dangerous Escapes

The most concerning incident occurred on September 8, 2022, when a 74-degree day turned dangerous for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and communication disorders. The resident, identified as R259, followed an oxygen vendor through the facility's main entrance after the security alarm system failed to activate due to disconnected wires.

Advertisement

The vendor later told investigators he noticed the resident "propelling fast in her wheelchair towards the left side of the facility parking lot" but initially thought she might be a visitor due to her relatively young age. The resident had severe cognitive impairment, scoring just two out of 15 on standardized mental status assessments, and required a wheelchair for mobility due to stroke-related complications.

A Certified Nursing Assistant eating lunch in the parking lot spotted the resident and called the front desk to ask if she was supposed to be outside. The employee then "jumped out of her truck and ran to R259, who had rolled herself all the way down the road and was about three houses from the main road." When asked where she was going, the resident replied she was "going home."

The facility's maintenance director discovered the security sensor had been "knocked loose" and immediately repaired the system. However, this revealed a critical gap in the facility's safety monitoring - the wander guard alarm that should have prevented the exit was completely non-functional due to maintenance issues.

Pattern of Multiple Elopement Incidents

Less than two months later, on October 27, 2022, another resident with severe cognitive impairment managed to leave the facility. R82, who had been admitted with anoxic brain damage and dementia, exited through the front entrance around 7:47 PM during evening hours. A neighbor arrived at the facility shortly after 7:58 PM to report that he believed one of their residents was at his home.

The neighbor described finding R82 asking for a ride and providing "non-working telephone numbers" in her confused state. She was wearing only "a shirt, pants and a pair of socks with grips on bottom" without a coat, despite the chilly evening weather. The neighbor had to provide a blanket while repeatedly trying to contact the facility.

A Licensed Practical Nurse working that day told investigators she "always felt that the resident was an elopement risk" because R82 could walk despite using a wheelchair. The nurse had stepped outside for approximately 10 minutes for a break, leaving another nurse to monitor the resident, when the elopement occurred.

On January 2, 2023, R82 eloped again from the same front entrance at approximately 4:45 PM, requiring staff members to retrieve her from a neighbor's residence where she was found sitting on their couch.

Medical Risks and Safety Concerns

Elopement incidents in nursing homes pose severe medical risks, particularly for residents with cognitive impairments and mobility limitations. When residents with dementia or other cognitive disorders leave supervised care, they face immediate dangers including exposure to weather elements, traffic hazards, and the inability to seek help or communicate their needs effectively.

For wheelchair-bound residents like R259, additional risks include potential falls during transfers, exhaustion from self-propulsion over distances, and inability to navigate outdoor terrain safely. The outdoor temperature of 74 degrees during R259's incident, while mild, could still pose risks for extended exposure without proper supervision or hydration.

Residents with cognitive impairments often experience disorientation and may not recognize familiar surroundings or understand their limitations. This creates particular vulnerability when they encounter strangers or traffic situations, as their impaired judgment may lead to dangerous decisions.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Regulatory Requirements and Best Practices

Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain comprehensive safety systems for residents at risk of wandering or elopement. These standards mandate that facilities must assess each resident's elopement risk upon admission and with any change in condition, implementing appropriate interventions to prevent unsafe wandering while maintaining the least restrictive environment possible.

Proper elopement prevention requires multiple layers of protection: functioning alarm systems, adequate staffing for supervision, staff training on recognizing and responding to exit-seeking behaviors, and individualized care plans that address each resident's specific risk factors and needs.

The wander guard technology used at Regency Center represents standard industry practice for monitoring at-risk residents. These devices should trigger immediate alarms when residents approach exits, allowing staff to intervene before unsafe situations develop. Regular testing and maintenance of these systems is essential to ensure continuous protection.

Industry best practices also include maintaining visual supervision of high-risk residents, particularly during shift changes and busy periods when staffing attention may be divided. The facility's own policies required ongoing identification of safety risks through employee training, monitoring, and quality assurance reviews.

Staffing and Training Deficiencies

The inspection revealed significant gaps in staff understanding of emergency procedures. The former Director of Nursing acknowledged that during re-education following the incidents, "some of the staff were not aware of the process of what to do when the alarm went off, some of the CNAs stated to her that they did not realize they were to respond, but thought other staff members were responsible for checking the doors."

This confusion about roles and responsibilities created dangerous gaps in resident safety. When security alarms activated, some staff members failed to respond because they incorrectly assumed others would handle the situation. The facility had only three permanent staff members during R259's elopement, with the remainder being agency workers who may have had limited familiarity with facility procedures and at-risk residents.

The former Director of Nursing also noted that one incident occurred during shift change, a particularly vulnerable time when communication between incoming and outgoing staff may be incomplete. These transitions require enhanced vigilance and clear handoff procedures to maintain continuous supervision of high-risk residents.

Corrective Actions and System Improvements

Following the incidents, the facility implemented extensive corrective measures including daily elopement drills, enhanced staff education, and system modifications. The maintenance director added strobe lights and higher-decibel alarms to improve staff response times, while also relocating door sensors to prevent accidental damage.

The facility extended orientation periods to one full week for new staff and dedicated specific training time to customer safety and escalation procedures. Management also established procedures to ensure continuous coverage at the front desk, including extending receptionist hours and requiring coverage during breaks.

Quality assurance meetings were expanded to include regular review of elopement prevention measures, with the medical director participating in oversight of safety protocols. The facility also conducted comprehensive reassessments of all residents' elopement risks and updated care plans accordingly.

Additional Issues Identified

Beyond the major elopement incidents, the inspection documented various other compliance concerns including gaps in maintenance documentation, inconsistencies in risk assessment timing, and coordination issues between different staff departments during emergency responses.

The facility's investigation processes revealed delays in completing comprehensive system checks and documentation following incidents. Communication protocols between maintenance staff, nursing personnel, and administrative leadership required strengthening to ensure rapid identification and correction of safety hazards.

Training documentation showed gaps in ensuring all staff, including temporary agency workers, received comprehensive education on facility-specific safety procedures and resident risk factors before beginning independent duties.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Regency Center from 2024-08-02 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources