Inspection Report

Lodge at Wellmore-Tega Cay: Dementia Patient Elopement SC

November 7, 2025

Fort Mill, SC

264 views

FORT MILL, SC - Federal inspectors documented immediate jeopardy-level violations at The Lodge at Wellmore-Tega Cay after a cognitively impaired resident wandered out of the facility undetected and was found injured on the ground outside, despite being equipped with a wander monitoring device that failed to alert staff.

Severe Cognitive Impairment Inadequately Addressed

The resident, identified as R1, was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with multiple diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder, pneumonia, and hypertension. Hospital records from her admission documented a history of dementia, falls, and that she had been "found in her bed by memory care staff minimally responsive."

According to facility assessments, R1 scored 6 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severe cognitive impairment. Despite this significant deficit, the facility's initial Elopement Risk Tool assessment rated R1 at zero out of nine points for elopement risk. This occurred even though R1 was documented as "cognitively impaired and independently ambulatory"—two factors that typically increase wandering risk.

Medical records from R1's first days at the facility revealed concerning patterns that should have prompted heightened monitoring. A progress note from April 6 documented that the resident "keeps wandering around" and exhibited "behavioral issues and wanders frequently without exit seeking throughout the night." Another note stated R1 was "confused and refused/spit out medication" and became "upset when redirected to where her room was."

Wander Alert System Failed at Critical Moment

On April 8, 2024, at approximately 5:55 PM, a visitor alerted nursing staff that a resident was outside on the ground. Staff found R1 sitting on grass near the sidewalk outside the facility with lacerations to her right eyebrow and scalp, along with bleeding, scabbed areas on her right lower leg. The resident was transported to the emergency room where sutures were placed for the lacerations.

R1 was wearing a Roam Alert wrist or ankle band device designed to trigger alarms when residents approach monitored doorways. However, facility records from the TekCare monitoring system showed no documentation that R1's wander guard device alerted on the day of the elopement. Multiple staff members confirmed they heard no alarms during the incident.

The facility's wander management system had a critical gap: doors leading to interior courtyards were not equipped with functioning alarms. During the survey, inspectors observed that when a resident wearing a wander guard device approached the courtyard door and gate near where R1 was found, no alarm sounded. The courtyard was surrounded by an iron gate accessible with a code, creating a false sense of security while leaving residents vulnerable if they could access the courtyard area.

Family Warnings Not Heeded

R1's responsible party reported providing explicit warnings about elopement risk during the admission process. The family member stated: "Upon admission I told them of my concerns about it not being a locked unit. I told them that the room being next to a courtyard is not a good decision. My mom voiced that she wanted out. She also has a history of exit seeking behavior."

The family disclosed that R1 had previously eloped from another facility and had been placed in memory care as a result. Prior to that incident, R1 had eloped from the family's home and driven away, requiring authorities to issue a be-on-the-lookout alert. Despite this documented history of exit-seeking behavior and multiple elopements, the facility's risk assessment concluded R1 was not at elopement risk.

Cognitive impairment creates specific vulnerabilities that require specialized safety measures. When individuals with dementia experience disorientation, they may attempt to leave in search of familiar people or places from their past. This behavior represents a medical emergency, as cognitively impaired individuals who wander are at high risk for injury, hypothermia, dehydration, and death if not quickly located.

Monitoring Deficiencies Extended Beyond Technology

Staff interviews revealed inadequate understanding of wander guard monitoring procedures. One nurse stated that wander guard checks consisted of "visibly seeing that the device is in place. There is no other way to check, I just ensure that I see the device." This approach failed to verify whether devices were actually functioning and communicating with the monitoring system.

The facility's surveillance cameras were inoperable at the time of the elopement, eliminating another potential safety layer. Facility staff were unable to identify which visitor discovered R1 outside, and no investigation was documented to determine how long the resident had been outside unattended.

Proper wander management protocols require multiple overlapping safety systems. Electronic monitoring devices serve as one component, but must be regularly tested for functionality, battery life, and proper signal transmission. Visual monitoring through staff rounds, camera surveillance, and secured exits creates redundancy that prevents single-point failures from resulting in resident harm.

Additional Issues Identified

The facility's policies required checking wander guard placement and positioning twice daily, but did not include functional testing of signal transmission. The Roam Alert system was designed to display alerts on staff station computers and alarm to direct care staff pagers, but no evidence indicated these backup notification methods functioned during R1's elopement. Weekly system testing used only a test tag rather than actual resident devices, failing to verify individual device functionality.

Following the incident, inspectors determined the facility achieved substantial compliance on July 24, 2024, after implementing immediate corrective measures including installation of door alarms on the courtyard entrance, establishment of escort requirements for at-risk residents in courtyard areas, provision of 1:1 supervision for R1 until discharge, and comprehensive staff re-training on elopement prevention protocols.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for The Lodge At Wellmore- Tega Cay from 2024-07-25 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

Editorial Standards

Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: June 20, 2026 · Our methodology

Quick Answer

The Lodge At Wellmore- Tega Cay in Fort Mill, SC was cited for violations during a health inspection on July 25, 2024.

Despite this significant deficit, the facility's initial Elopement Risk Tool assessment rated R1 at zero out of nine points for elopement risk.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at The Lodge At Wellmore- Tega Cay?

Despite this significant deficit, the facility's initial Elopement Risk Tool assessment rated R1 at zero out of nine points for elopement risk.

How serious are these violations?

Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.

What should families do?

Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in Fort Mill, SC, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.

Where can I see the full inspection report?

The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from The Lodge At Wellmore- Tega Cay or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 425407.

Has this facility had violations before?

To check The Lodge At Wellmore- Tega Cay's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.