WILKES BARRE, PA - State health inspectors documented serious failures in abuse prevention and investigation protocols at Hampton House nursing home, finding that staff failed to properly investigate a suspicious leg fracture and allowed an abusive employee to continue working with vulnerable residents for a week after threatening a disabled patient.
Failure to Investigate Suspicious Injury
The most concerning violation involved a resident with Alzheimer's disease and osteopenia who suffered a fractured tibia and fibula under suspicious circumstances. The resident, who required assistance from two staff members for all transfers and mobility according to their care plan, was found with the serious leg injury during a routine check.
Critical documentation discrepancies emerged during the investigation. Employee 3, a nursing aide, had signed documentation indicating she provided care to the resident using only one staff member for bed mobility at 2:16 AM and toileting assistance at 2:14 AM - directly contradicting the resident's established care requirements. When questioned about the incident, Employee 3 stated in her witness statement that she "did not notice anything with the resident's legs" and provided no documentation of what care she actually delivered, despite signing off on providing assistance.
The facility's investigation concluded that the resident's behavioral issues and bone disease "could have contributed to the leg fracture," but failed to address the staffing protocol violations that occurred during the shift when the injury likely occurred. Medical experts note that tibia-fibula fractures in elderly patients with osteopenia can result from improper handling or transfers, particularly when adequate staffing protocols are not followed.
Fractures in nursing home residents with cognitive impairment require thorough investigation because these patients often cannot communicate how injuries occurred. Federal regulations mandate that facilities investigate all injuries of unknown origin to rule out potential abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. In this case, the facility's own policy required "prompt and thorough investigation" of suspected abuse situations.
The resident's documented care needs included two-person assistance due to physical limitations and behavioral issues. Osteopenia, a condition involving reduced bone density, makes bones significantly more fragile and prone to fracture with minimal force or improper handling. When established safety protocols are not followed, the risk of serious injury increases substantially.
Verbal Abuse Incident Goes Uninvestigated for Weeks
Perhaps even more disturbing was the facility's handling of witnessed verbal and mental abuse against a cognitively intact resident with bilateral below-knee amputations. On the date in question, Employee 3 was observed by multiple staff members making threatening and derogatory statements to Resident A1 that met the definition of mental and verbal abuse according to the facility's own policies.
Multiple witnesses documented the severity of the incident. Employee 5, another nursing aide, reported hearing Employee 3 call the resident "no good filthy mother fcker" and witnessed her "aggressively slapping her chest" while saying "I'll drag your no-legged ass out of this motherfcker." The registered nurse supervisor had to physically intervene, holding Employee 3 back to prevent her from getting closer to the resident.
During the confrontation, Employee 3 allegedly told Resident A1, "You are the one in the room sleeping; you will end up dead" - a statement that constituted a direct threat. The resident reported staying awake until 1:00 AM on subsequent shifts when Employee 3 was working because he feared she might attempt to harm him.
The facility's response violated its own abuse prevention protocols. Despite the witnessed abuse and threats, Employee 3 was merely reassigned to a different hall and continued working with residents for the remainder of her shift. She continued providing care to residents for an entire week until Employee 5 reported her concerns to administration. The facility terminated Employee 3 only after the nursing aide came forward with her concerns about the lack of action.
Medical and Safety Implications
These violations represent serious breakdowns in resident protection systems. Mental and verbal abuse can cause significant psychological harm to nursing home residents, particularly those who are physically vulnerable or cognitively impaired. Threats of violence create an atmosphere of fear that can negatively impact a resident's overall health and quality of life.
The failure to immediately remove an abusive employee from resident contact violates fundamental safety principles. Industry standards require immediate suspension of employees accused of abuse pending investigation, specifically to protect residents from potential retaliation or escalation of abusive behavior.
Proper injury investigation protocols exist for critical safety reasons. When care plan requirements are not followed and suspicious injuries occur, facilities must thoroughly examine all circumstances to determine if neglect or improper care contributed to the harm. The documentation discrepancies in this case - showing one-person care provided when two-person assistance was required - represented significant red flags that warranted immediate investigation.
For residents with osteopenia, proper handling techniques and adherence to transfer protocols are essential to prevent fractures. Even minor deviations from established procedures can result in serious injuries in patients with compromised bone density. The failure to investigate these protocol violations potentially put other vulnerable residents at risk.
Administrative Failures and Missing Documentation
The facility's administrative response demonstrated systemic problems with abuse reporting and investigation procedures. When questioned by state inspectors, facility leadership could not produce the witness statements that the supervising nurse had collected and submitted following the verbal abuse incident. This documentation failure hindered the investigation and suggested inadequate record-keeping for serious incidents.
The Director of Nursing and Administrator acknowledged during interviews that they failed to protect residents from potential further abuse by allowing Employee 3 to continue working after the witnessed incident. This admission highlighted the disconnect between the facility's written policies and actual implementation of resident protection measures.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to have comprehensive abuse prevention and investigation procedures. These protocols must include immediate removal of suspected abusers from resident contact, thorough documentation of incidents, and systematic investigation of all allegations or suspicious circumstances.
Additional Issues Identified
The inspection also documented other concerning practices including inadequate supervision of care provision and failure to follow established documentation procedures. The case highlighted broader concerns about staff training, supervision, and adherence to established care protocols designed to protect vulnerable residents.
The investigation revealed gaps in the facility's quality assurance systems that should have identified and addressed the protocol violations before serious harm occurred. Regular auditing of care documentation and supervision of staff performance are essential components of effective nursing home operations.
The violations demonstrate the critical importance of robust abuse prevention systems in long-term care facilities, where residents may be unable to advocate for themselves or report concerning incidents. When these protective systems fail, vulnerable residents face increased risks of harm from both inadequate care and potential mistreatment.
State health officials classified these violations as having caused minimal harm with potential for actual harm, but the documented incidents illustrate how quickly situations can escalate when proper safeguards are not maintained. The facility's failure to follow its own established procedures created an environment where resident safety was compromised.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Hampton House from 2024-07-02 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
💬 Join the Discussion
Comments are moderated. Please keep discussions respectful and relevant to nursing home care quality.