Federal inspectors found staff at Beaumont Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for two residents with open wounds, despite clear signage and physician orders requiring additional protection during high-contact care.
The violations occurred in plain sight of infection control warnings. Resident 70's room displayed an enhanced barrier precaution sign on the left side of the door, with a personal protective equipment canister positioned just outside. The sign clearly indicated staff must use hand hygiene, gowns, and gloves for all high-contact resident care, including wound care.
On June 27, inspectors watched LPN 12 and CNA 13 enter Resident 70's room for wound care. Both staff members washed their hands and put on gloves, but neither wore the required gown. Throughout the procedure, both leaned against the resident's mattress with their unprotected clothing while LPN 12 removed a moderately soiled dressing from the resident's right buttock.
The wound bed was covered with slough, a sign of tissue breakdown and potential infection risk.
Resident 70 had a current physician's order from April 25 specifically requiring enhanced barrier precaution isolation for high-contact resident activities. The order mandated gown and glove use for dressing changes, bathing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, assisting with toileting, device care, and wound care every shift.
Similar failures occurred with Resident 83. Her room also displayed enhanced barrier precaution signage to the left of the door, with a PPE canister located behind the door. Like Resident 70, she had a physician's order from April 25 requiring the same enhanced precautions.
During wound care observation on June 27, LPN 12 approached Resident 83's room, clearly seeing the enhanced barrier precaution sign indicating high-contact care such as wound care required hand hygiene, gowns, and gloves. She entered the room, washed her hands, and donned gloves for wound care.
She did not wear a gown.
LPN 12 removed the dressing from a wound on the left lateral foot that was open, slightly smaller than the tip of an eraser, with discernible depth. A small amount of serous drainage was noted on the removed dressing.
When confronted by inspectors immediately after the wound care procedures, LPN 12 demonstrated concerning confusion about the facility's own infection control protocols. She indicated she was uncertain if both residents were actually listed for enhanced barrier precautions during wound care, or if the signs were posted for their roommates.
This uncertainty persisted even though she had just performed wound care in rooms with clear signage.
Twenty minutes later, LPN 12 acknowledged both Resident 70 and Resident 83 had orders for enhanced barrier precautions. She admitted she had not worn a gown during wound care for either resident that day, despite knowing enhanced barrier precautions required gown and glove use for high-contact care such as wound care.
CNA 13 revealed even more troubling gaps in staff knowledge. She told inspectors she was uncertain what personal protective equipment should be worn for enhanced barrier precautions and when they should be implemented. This admission came after she had just assisted with wound care in Resident 70's room, which displayed enhanced barrier precaution signage on the door.
Only after reading the sign on the door during the inspector interview did CNA 13 realize she should have worn a gown in addition to gloves during the wound care.
LPN 10, interviewed separately, demonstrated proper understanding of the protocols. She told inspectors any high-contact care for residents with open wounds required enhanced barrier precautions, including proper hand hygiene, gown, and glove use. She confirmed wound care was considered high-contact care.
The Director of Nursing acknowledged the violations during a July 1 interview, stating enhanced barrier precautions should have been followed by all staff during wound care. She said the facility followed physician's orders as a nursing standard of practice.
Enhanced barrier precautions exist to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms, according to the facility's own policy provided during the inspection. The undated policy states enhanced barrier precautions employ targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities, with gloves and gowns applied before performing high-contact care.
The policy specifically lists wound care as an example of high-contact resident care requiring gown and glove use.
Multi-drug resistant organisms pose serious health risks in nursing home settings, where vulnerable residents with compromised immune systems live in close quarters. When staff fail to follow infection control protocols during wound care, they can transfer dangerous bacteria from infected residents to others through contaminated clothing and equipment.
The inspection found these violations affected few residents but created minimal harm or potential for actual harm. However, the failures occurred despite clear physician orders, visible signage, written policies, and available protective equipment.
Both residents required enhanced precautions specifically because they harbored organisms that could spread to other residents through improper infection control practices. The wounds themselves presented additional infection risks, with Resident 70's wound covered in slough and Resident 83's wound producing drainage.
Staff confusion about basic infection control requirements suggests broader training failures at the facility. When a certified nursing assistant admits uncertainty about when to use protective equipment, and a licensed practical nurse cannot identify which residents require enhanced precautions despite clear door signage, the breakdown extends beyond individual mistakes to systemic problems.
The facility's Corporate Nurse Consultant provided the enhanced barrier precautions policy to inspectors, indicating awareness of the requirements at the administrative level. Yet front-line staff demonstrated fundamental misunderstanding of protocols designed to protect the most vulnerable residents from dangerous infections.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Beaumont Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from 2024-07-02 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Beaumont Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
- Browse all IN nursing home inspections
