Skip to main content

The Villas at St. Paul: Resident Preference Failures - MN

Healthcare Facility
The Villas At St Paul
Saint Paul, MN  ·  3/5 stars

Federal inspectors reviewing records from a June 2024 inspection found that a resident identified in reports as R74 was admitted with fully intact cognition. The admission assessment documented no delirium, no disorganized thinking, no altered consciousness, no hallucinations, no delusions, and no behavioral symptoms of any kind. R74 was, by every clinical measure in the record, a person fully capable of stating their own preferences.

The assessment also noted that R74 depended on staff for showering and bathing, which made the question of how they wanted that done more important, not less. Federal guidelines for nursing home assessments are explicit on this point: when a resident can speak for themselves, staff are supposed to ask them directly about their preferences for daily routines and activities, including whether they want a tub bath, a shower, or a bed bath. The preference interview is supposed to be completed during the admission process.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It wasn't completed. Inspectors found the section of R74's assessment that required a bathing preference interview had not been conducted at all.

The violation falls under a federal standard designed to protect what regulators call the right to self-determination, the idea that residents in long-term care facilities retain the ability to shape their own daily lives, particularly around something as personal as how their body is cleaned. The assessment tool inspectors referenced, the Minimum Data Set, exists precisely to capture that kind of information so care plans can reflect what an individual actually wants rather than what is easiest for staff to provide.

For a resident who cannot bathe independently, that distinction matters in a direct, daily way. Whether someone is lowered into a tub, guided into a shower, or washed in bed is not a minor scheduling detail. It involves physical contact, vulnerability, and a degree of dignity that depends entirely on the person receiving care having some say in the matter.

R74 had that say available. The cognition was there. The ability to answer a question about bathing preferences was documented to be intact. The interview simply did not happen.

The Villas at St. Paul is a long-term care facility operating under Medicare and Medicaid certification, which subjects it to federal inspection standards and the requirement that resident assessments be completed accurately and in full. The admission MDS for R74 was dated at the time of admission. The gap inspectors identified was not a matter of a preference changing over time or a resident becoming unable to respond. The interview was flagged as something that should be conducted and then, according to the inspection record, was not assessed.

Inspectors did not document whether R74 was later asked about bathing preferences informally, whether staff had simply been providing whatever bath type was most convenient, or whether R74 had ever raised a concern. The inspection record captures only what the formal assessment showed, and what it showed was an empty field where a resident's answer was supposed to be.

The facility had the information it needed to ask the question. It had a resident who could answer. The assessment form even specified that the interview should happen. What the record does not contain is any indication that anyone sat down with R74 and asked.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for The Villas At St Paul from 2024-06-27 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources


Editorial Standards

Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: July 5, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

THE VILLAS AT ST PAUL in SAINT PAUL, MN was cited for violations during a health inspection on June 27, 2024.

Federal inspectors reviewing records from a June 2024 inspection found that a resident identified in reports as R74 was admitted with fully intact cognition.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at THE VILLAS AT ST PAUL?
Federal inspectors reviewing records from a June 2024 inspection found that a resident identified in reports as R74 was admitted with fully intact cognition.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SAINT PAUL, MN, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from THE VILLAS AT ST PAUL or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 245340.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check THE VILLAS AT ST PAUL's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.


Advertisement