The facility's system for monitoring controlled substances broke down across multiple levels during a June inspection. Twenty-four of 124 shifts between May 1 and June 11 had no nursing signatures on narcotic count sheets. The remaining 100 shifts showed identical signatures for both the incoming and outgoing nurses — an impossibility that suggested one person signed for both.
"The RNs did not sign the sheet correctly," Director of Nursing acknowledged to inspectors. "Some forgot to sign as they completed the count."
When inspectors pressed for the facility's policy on narcotic counting, the Director of Nursing couldn't locate it.
The breakdown extended to actual medication administration. Inspectors found three residents who received narcotic medications that were never recorded in their medical files.
Resident 5 received alprazolam for anxiety on May 30 at 3:59 p.m., according to the automated dispensing cabinet records. But no administration record existed for that dose. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the medication "was not recorded in the Emergency Drug Supply Log Sheet."
Resident 43's case was more troubling. The facility's narcotic log showed three doses of hydrocodone-acetaminophen dispensed in June — on June 1, June 8, and June 11. But the resident's electronic medication record showed administration documented for only one of those doses. Two doses given on June 8 and June 11 had "no documentation in MAR," the Director of Nursing told inspectors.
The same pattern emerged with Resident 239, who received Norco on June 7 and June 12 according to narcotic logs, but had no corresponding entries in the medication administration record.
During the inspection, Licensed Vocational Nurse 7 presented bubble packs of hydrocodone-acetaminophen for Resident 43, while Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 had Norco ready for Resident 239. Both were legitimate prescriptions, but the facility's tracking system couldn't account for previous doses.
The medication labeling problems went beyond missing records. Inspectors found Resident 239's Norco bubble pack labeled for every eight hours, but the physician had ordered it every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. The Director of Nursing explained that when dosages change, nurses should contact the pharmacy for a correction sticker, but none had been applied.
The facility's emergency medication kit presented another gap. When nurses take medications from the emergency supply, they're supposed to log each use separately. But alprazolam taken for Resident 5 never appeared in the emergency log, despite being dispensed from that supply.
Two nursing assistants compounded infection control problems during lunch service on June 13. Certified Nursing Assistants 1 and 2 passed meal trays to residents without performing hand hygiene between contacts.
"I did not perform hand hygiene between residents while passing out their lunch trays," CNA 1 told inspectors. CNA 2 said she "was rushing when passing out the lunch trays and forgot to perform hand hygiene."
Both acknowledged they should have washed hands to prevent spreading infection.
The facility's approach to cleaning shared equipment violated basic infection control principles. Restorative Nursing Aide 1 used 70% isopropyl alcohol spray to disinfect a cloth gait belt after helping Resident 96 with walking exercises.
The Infection Preventionist nurse reviewed manufacturer instructions and found the alcohol spray was only effective on hard, non-porous surfaces. Cloth gait belts, being fabric, required laundering after each resident use. The facility's own policy stated staff should "not use fabric-based equipment if it will likely be contaminated with body fluids."
"The isopropyl alcohol spray and bleach germicidal wipes were ineffective cleaning agents because cloth gait belts were made of porous materials," the Infection Preventionist concluded.
A third infection control violation involved Resident 3's nephrostomy tube drainage bag, which inspectors observed positioned at the same level as the resident's body on four separate occasions. The bag should remain below kidney level to prevent urine backflow and potential infection.
"When nephrostomy tube bag was in the same level of the kidney urine does not flow by gravity and can create urine backflow and might lead to infection," Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 explained.
The facility's quality assurance system failed to catch any of these problems before the federal inspection. The Quality Assessment and Assurance committee and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee didn't identify the medication tracking failures, infection control lapses, or equipment cleaning issues.
During a June 13 interview, the Director of Nursing admitted to "not being able to identify systemic issues identified even before the survey." The Administrator acknowledged the facility had "opportunities for improvement of all mentioned deficient practices."
The facility's consent policy for psychotropic medications was also outdated. The Assistant Director of Nursing said prescribers obtained informed consent, but the facility's written policy stated "There is no requirement to obtain a new consent when a dosage change is made" and "The facility is not responsible for obtaining a signature."
The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged the policy "did not match the current regulatory requirements." The consultant pharmacist confirmed they were "in the process of updating the policy."
Heritage Rehabilitation Center serves residents with complex medical needs, including those with spinal stenosis, metabolic encephalopathy, paraplegia, and epilepsy. The medication tracking failures created particular risks for residents requiring controlled substances for pain management and anxiety.
The identical signatures on narcotic count sheets meant the facility couldn't verify that two different nurses actually performed the required checks. Missing administration records made it impossible to track whether residents received prescribed medications or if doses were diverted.
Federal inspectors classified the violations as having "minimal harm or potential for actual harm" but noted they created risks for "loss of accountability, medication errors, issues in residents' rights, and/or diversions or theft of medications."
The facility's own policies required proper documentation and infection control measures, but staff repeatedly failed to follow them during routine care activities.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Heritage Rehabilitation Center from 2024-06-13 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Heritage Rehabilitation Center
- Browse all CA nursing home inspections
