Skip to main content

Gardens on University: Falls, Trauma Care Failures - WA

Healthcare Facility
Aurora Valley Care
Spokane, WA  ·  2/5 stars

SPOKANE, WA - The Gardens On University nursing facility faced significant regulatory violations during a June 2024 inspection, with investigators documenting failures in fall prevention protocols, trauma-informed care practices, and dementia behavior management that placed vulnerable residents at risk.

Resident Sustains 13 Falls in 44 Days Due to Inadequate Safety Protocols

The most serious violation centered on a cognitively impaired resident who experienced 13 falls in just 44 days between April and June 2024. The resident, identified as having non-traumatic brain dysfunction, transient ischemic attacks, and reversible encephalopathy, was classified as high risk for falls due to their history of falling and tendency to overestimate their physical capabilities.

Despite facility policies requiring immediate implementation of new fall interventions after each incident, investigators found systematic failures in the facility's response. The resident experienced falls on multiple dates including April 23, May 1, May 7, May 10, May 17, May 23, May 24, May 28, and May 30 (twice), June 2, June 5, and June 6, 2024.

Critical documentation gaps emerged during the investigation. When inspectors requested all 13 fall incident reports, the facility initially provided only 8 reports. After a second request, they still failed to provide documentation for the June 2 fall, indicating incomplete record-keeping for mandatory safety incidents.

The facility's response to these repeated falls revealed concerning delays in medical evaluation. After the May 7 fall, a pharmacy medication review was completed six days later, but the physician didn't review the pharmacist's recommendations until 31 days after the fall occurred. This delayed response contradicts established protocols for timely medical assessment following resident injuries.

Ineffective Fall Prevention Measures Despite Multiple Interventions

The resident's care plan documented numerous attempted interventions, including call light placement, visual cues, scheduled toileting, nighttime checks, fall mats, specialized call buttons, and ultimately one-on-one supervision. However, the implementation and effectiveness of these measures proved inadequate.

Particularly concerning was the facility's inconsistent application of one-on-one monitoring. After implementing this intensive supervision measure on May 30 following a dining room fall, the resident fell again that same evening with no documentation indicating the monitoring was in place. This pattern repeated during subsequent falls on June 5 and June 6, when incident reports showed the resident was "found on the floor in their room alone and unattended" despite supposedly having continuous supervision.

Falls in nursing homes represent a significant patient safety concern, with approximately 1,800 deaths annually resulting from fall-related injuries in long-term care facilities. For residents with cognitive impairment, the risk increases substantially due to their inability to recognize safety limitations and remember instructions. Effective fall prevention requires immediate assessment of contributing factors, swift implementation of targeted interventions, and continuous monitoring of intervention effectiveness.

The failure to prevent repeated falls in cognitively impaired residents can lead to serious injuries including hip fractures, head trauma, and decreased mobility. Each fall also increases anxiety and fear, potentially leading to further functional decline and reduced quality of life.

Trauma-Informed Care Failures Expose Domestic Violence Survivor to Retraumatization

The facility also failed to provide appropriate trauma-informed care for a resident with a documented history of domestic violence and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Hospital records clearly indicated the resident had experienced verbal and physical abuse from their spouse and required alternative living arrangements due to an "emotionally abusive and unkept environment."

Despite this known trauma history, the facility's initial assessment documented that the resident "had not experienced or witnessed any traumatic events," directly contradicting hospital documentation. More critically, the facility placed this domestic violence survivor in a room with a roommate known for aggressive, verbal outbursts - a potentially retraumatizing environment.

The incident occurred just one day after admission when "Resident 3 was aggressively grabbed by the arm by their roommate when the roommate experienced an episode of agitation. Resident 3's roommate was aggressive, screamed, and struck out. Resident 3 was confused by the roommate's aggressive behaviors and was moved out of the room."

Editorial Standards & Data Disclosure

Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.

Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.

Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.

Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: September 19, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

AURORA VALLEY CARE in SPOKANE, WA was cited for violations during a health inspection on June 12, 2024.

Critical documentation gaps emerged during the investigation.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at AURORA VALLEY CARE?
Critical documentation gaps emerged during the investigation.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SPOKANE, WA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from AURORA VALLEY CARE or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 505114.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check AURORA VALLEY CARE's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.